SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1936 Supreme(SC) 58

James Eggay Taylor – Appellant
Versus
United Africa Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.L. Bryden, Cyril Asquith, Tuchen, Alexa Anderson, R.K. Chappel

Lord Maugham:-

This appeal has taken a somewhat unfortunate course. It is an appeal from a judgment of the West African Court of Appeal setting aside a judgment of the Divisional Court sitting at Cape Coast Castle. The action was one by the United African Company, Limited, the respondents in the appeal, against a person who had been employed as agent for them for some years, based upon his negligence in carrying out his duties under a written contract, dated 30th July 1933, that is, his breach of his contractual liabilities under that contract, and it also was based to some extent upon the fact that under Cl. 3 of the written contract he was responsible for any deficiency as regards goods and moneys received at the factory of which he was in charge, due directly or indirectly to his act, neglect, or default. There is absolutely nothing in the statement of claim, which was amended in due course on an application by the defendant, which suggested any sort of fraud on the part of the agent, the defendant; a fortiori there was no suggestion that the moneys which the plaintiffs alleged had been lost, amounting to the sum of £7,816, had been lost owing to the circumstance that the defenda












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top