Attorney-General of British Columbia – Appellant
Versus
Attorney-General of Canada and others – Respondent
Lord Atkin:-
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada delivered on 17th June 1936, on a reference by the Governor-General in Council dated 5th November 1935, raising the question whether S. 498-A of the Criminal Code is ultra vires of the Parliament of Canada. The Supreme Court unanimously held that sub-ss. (b) and (c) were not ultra vires, and by a majority, the Chief Justice, Rinfret, Davis and Kerwin, JJ., Cannon and Crocket, JJ. dissenting, held that sub-s. (a) also was not ultra vires. The S. 498-A was introduced into the Criminal Code by S. 9 of 25 and 26 Geo. V., C. 56, the title of which is an Act to amend the Criminal Code:
Section 9. The said Act is further amended by inserting after section four hundred and ninety-eight the following section:
498-A. Every person engaged in trade or commerce or industry is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a penalty not exceeding one thousand dollars or to one month's imprisonment, or, if a corporation, to a penalty not exceeding five thousand dollars, who
(a) is a party or privy to, or assists in, any transaction or sale which discriminates, to his knowledge, against competitors of the purchaser in that an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.