1937 Supreme(SC) 36
Privy Council At Oudh
Sir George Rankin, Sir Shadi Lal, Justice Lord Thankerton, JJ.
Mahabir Prasad and another -Appellant
Versus
Syed Mustafa Husain and others -Resopndent
Appeal No. 80 of 1934
Decided On : 19-03-1937
Hunter, Watkins, T.L. Wilson and Co., J.M. Pringle, R. Parikh, J.M. Parikh
An oral statement requires strict proof of testamentary intent to be a will. A wakf-alal-aulad intended for an entire estate and family fails if it cannot be applied comprehensively, as partial application based on agreements excluding minors would frustrate the settlor's overall scheme.
Headnote:(A) Wakf Validating Act, 1913 - Oral testament for a wakf (wasiyat bil wakf) - Strict proof required to establish testamentary intent - The court must be certain of the exact words spoken and must be able to infer from the circumstances and the statement that testamentary effect was intended, in addition to being satisfied with the content of the direction given.
(B) Wakf-alal-aulad - Validity of wakf based on agreement among heirs - Where a wakf is intended to encompass the entire estate and all family members, it cannot be held valid only in respect of the shares of those who consented if such partial application would frustrate the overall scheme, alter the operation of specific provisions, and produce results not intended by the parties.
(C) Indian Contract Act - Section 2 - Agreements involving minors - A wakf resting on an agreement to which minor children are not parties is void as to their shares, and if the wakf's viability depends on the inclusion of all shares, the entire dedication may fail.
Facts of the case:
A deceased person made an oral statement shortly before death regarding the disposition of his property. Subsequently, the heirs executed a deed of relinquishment in favor of the widow, who then created a wakf-alal-aulad for the benefit of the children. Later, some heirs sought partition of the property, while others claimed the property remained wakf. The dispute centered on whether the original oral statement was a will and whether the subsequent wakf was legally binding.
Findings of Court:
The oral statement did not constitute a testamentary disposition as there was no clear evidence of solemn testamentary intent. The subsequent wakf, based on an agreement among the widow and major children, was invalid because it could not be partially applied to only a portion of the estate without defeating the intended purpose and the specific distribution scheme outlined in the wakf-nama.
Issues: Whether the oral statement of the deceased amounted to a will for a wakf and whether a wakf created via agreement among some heirs is valid if it excludes the shares of minor children.
Ratio Decidendi: For an oral statement to be treated as a will, there must be strict proof of the words used and a clear inference of testamentary intent. Furthermore, a wakf intended to be comprehensive for a family and estate fails entirely if the exclusion of certain shares (due to minority) makes the specific provisions of the wakf-nama impossible to implement as intended, as the motive was to carry out a scheme involving the entire property and family.
Result: Appeal allowed.
Legal Category Hierarchy
-
islamic law
-
wakf
- wakf-alal-aulad
-
succession
- wills and testaments
- dower
-
wakf
-
practice and procedure
-
evidence
- oral evidence
-
execution
- attachment of property
-
evidence
Sir George Rankin:-
On 13th April 1918, one Mir Fida Husain, a Mussalman of the Asna-Ashari sect of the Shias died leaving him surviving a widow, six sons of whom two were minors, and three daughters of whom two were minors. The appellants are judgment-creditors of three of the sons-viz., Mohammad Askari Hasan Askari and Baqar Mehdi - who were all of full age at the date of their father's death. In execution of money decrees against these sons the appellants in 1928 attached certain of the properties left by Mir Fida Husain, in consequence whereof they were impleaded as defendants 1 and 2 in the suit out of which this appeal arises. This suit was brought on 17th October 1929, by two of Mir Fida Husain's daughters seeking to establish that the whole of the properties left by their father, including the properties attached by the appellants, were wakf property. The learned Subordinate Judge has held that the shares (in all thirteen twentieths) which would ordinarily be inherited by the widow, and by the four sons and one daughter who were of age at the time of their father's death, had become wakf property; but that the remaining seven twentieths were not included in the wakf. The Chief Court of Oudh has held in effect that the wakf extends to the whole of the property left by Mir Fida Husain, which may be taken as worth about a lac of rupees and to have produced a gross income of over Rs. 13,000 per annum leaving a balance, after payment of land revenue, of Rs. 7,766.
A week or ten days before his death on 13th April 1918, Mir Fida Husain, as both Courts in India have found, made a statement, the precise effect of which is now in question. It is spoken to by five witnesses, two of whom gave evidence on commission, and' three at the trial before the learned Subordinate Judge. All his heirs are said to have been present when the statement was made, but though the five witnesses include a son-in-law, a nephew and a niece, none of his children have given evidence. Three witnesses at least are of good position-a Deputy Collector, a Hakim and an Honorary Magistrate. In fact after his death-in August 1918- Mt. Azmat-un-nisa, the widow, was, with her sons' consent, recorded by the revenue authorities as entitled for her life to the whole of her late husband's properties. Two and a half years after the death- viz., 16th December 1920, a registered deed was entered into by the members of the family in the following terms:
Whereas it was the desire of our father, the late Mir Fida Husain, that he should make a wakf of his property in favour of his children so that the property be saved from being wasted and with this particular object in view, the deceased got a draft prepared but owing to illness and the severity of his maladies, he could not get an opportunity to complete the deed and therefore a few days before his death, the deceased expressed his desire to all of us, his children, and made a will to us to the effect that after his death, mutation in respect of the entire property should be got effected in favour of our mother as absolute owner in lieu of her dower debt and he directed our mother to make a wakf in favour of children in respect of the entire property as her own; whereas after the death of our deceased father, the mutation of names was accordingly got effected in favour of our mother; but in the application for mutation, owing to a misapprehension of out intention, some such words came to be entered as seem to show that the ownership of our mother is limited to her life only and whereas this has given rise to complaint and displeasure on the part of our mother, so for the satisfaction and the removal of the complaints of our mother, and with a view to enforce the intention and will of our late father, we, the sons of the late Mir Saheb, do hereby affirm and reduce to writing that in conformity with the oral will of our late father, our mother, Mt. Azmat-un-nisa Begam, after the death of our father, has become the absolute