Privy Council At Canada
Macmillan, Russell of Killowen, Thankerton, Lords Atkin, Justice Lord Chancellor, JJ.
Attorney-General of Alberta -Appellant
Versus
Attorney-General of Canada, and others -Resopndent
Privy Council Appeal No. 48 of 1938
Decided On : 14-07-1938
Taxation - Power of Legislature of the Province of Alberta - S. 55, Supreme Court Act - Bill No. 1, Bill No. 8, Bill No. 9 - [S. 55, Supreme Court Act] - [Bill No. 1, Bill No. 8, Bill No. 9] - The judgment discusses the power of the Legislature of the Province of Alberta to enact three Bills: Bill No. 1, Bill No. 8, and Bill No. 9. The court unanimously held that the Bills should be answered in the negative. The Bills related to taxation of banks, regulation of credit institutions, and ensuring the publication of accurate news and information. The court analyzed the scope of the disputed Bills and their implications on the distribution of powers between the Dominion and the Province, ultimately finding that Bill No. 1 was ultra vires due to its legislative plan to prevent the operation of banking institutions within the province.
Fact of the Case:
The Attorney-General of Alberta appealed a judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding the power of the Legislature of the Province of Alberta to enact three Bills related to taxation of banks, regulation of credit institutions, and ensuring the publication of accurate news and information. The Supreme Court unanimously held that the Bills should be answered in the negative.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that Bill No. 1 was ultra vires as it was part of a legislative plan to prevent the operation of banking institutions within the province. The Bills related to taxation of banks, regulation of credit institutions, and ensuring the publication of accurate news and information.
Issues: The main issue was the power of the Legislature of the Province of Alberta to enact the three Bills, specifically examining the implications of the Bills on the distribution of powers between the Dominion and the Province.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the analysis of the scope of the disputed Bills and their implications on the distribution of powers between the Dominion and the Province. The court found that Bill No. 1 was ultra vires due to its legislative plan to prevent the operation of banking institutions within the province.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the court advised His Majesty to dismiss the appeal based on the reasons presented.
Lord Maugham:-
This is an appeal by the Attorney-General of Alberta from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada (Duff C.J., Cannon, Crocket, Davis, Kerwin and Hudson JJ.) dated 4th March 1938 on a reference to them by the Governor-General of Canada under S. 55, Supreme Court Act (Revised Statutes of Canada, 1927, c. 35). The subject of the reference and of this appeal is the power of the Legislature of the Province of Alberta to enact three Bills which had been presented to the Lieutenant-Governor of Alberta for assent on 5th October 1937, and reserved by him for the signification of the Governor-General's pleasure. By order in Council dated 2nd November 1937 the Governor-General referred the following questions to the Supreme Court of Canada for hearing and consideration :
1. Is Bill No. 1, entitled ' an Act respecting the Taxation of Banks' or any of the provisions thereof and in what particular or particulars or to what extent intra vires of the Legislature of the Province of Alberta ?
2. Is Bill No. 8, entitled 'an Act to Amend and Consolidate the Credit of Alberta Regulation Act' or any of the provisions thereof and in what particular or particulars or to what extent intra vires of the Legislature of the Province of Alberta ?
3. Is Bill No. 9, entitled 'an Act to ensure the Publication of Accurate News and Information' or any of the provisions thereof and in what particular or particulars or to what extent intra vires of the Legislature of the Province of Alberta ?
By the judgment of the Supreme Court dated 4th March 1938, the unanimous opinion of the Court on each of the three questions propounded was that it should be answered in the negative. It is necessary to set out briefly the scope of the disputed Bills.
Bill No. 1, entitled "an Act respecting the Taxation of Banks."
This Bill applied to every corporation or joint stock company other than the Bank of Canada incorporated for the purpose of doing banking or savings bank business and transacting such business in the Province. The Bill imposed upon every such bank an annual tax, in addition to any tax payable under any other Act, of (a) ½ per cent, on the paid-up capital and (b) 1 percent, on the reserve fund and undivided profits. Default on payment of tax was to be visited with penalties, and payment of either tax or penalty could be enforced by distress and sale of goods and chattels, or by action for civil debts. The tax was declared to be payable to the Provincial Secretary on behalf of His Majesty for the use of the Province. It is important to note that the tax is calculated by reference to the whole of the paid-up capital and reserves made throughout Canada and abroad.
Bill No. 8, entitled "an Act to Amend and Consolidate the Credit of Alberta Regulation Act, 1937."
This Bill applied to "credit institutions,"that is persons or corporations whose business was that of dealing in credit. Such business was defined in the Bill. The Bill required credit institutions carrying on business in the Province to take out licenses from the Provincial Credit Commission constituted by S. 4, Alberta Social Credit Act. Applications for licenses were to be accompanied by an undertaking signed by the applicant to refrain from acting or assisting or encouraging any person to act in a manner which restricts or interferes with the property and civil rights of any person in the Province. A breach of this undertaking might be visited by the Provincial Credit Commission with suspension or revocation of the license, subject to a right of appeal to the Social Credit Board constituted by the above mentioned Social Credit Act.
Before a license was granted to a credit institution, one or more Local Directorates were to be appointed to supervise, direct and control the policy of the institution's dealing in credit for the purpose of preventing any act constituting a restriction or interference with full enjoyment of property and civil rights by any person within the Province. A Local Directorate wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.