SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1939 Supreme(SC) 31

Mian Feroz Shah – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Akbar Khan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Allen, Stanley Johnson, T.L. Wilson & Co., W. Wallach, A.M. Dunne, J.M. Parikh, L. Cohen

Sir George Rankin:-

This appeal is brought by the plaintiff from a decision (23rd May 1936) of the Court of the Judicial Commissioner for the North-West Frontier Province affirming a decree of the Subordinate Judge of Peshawar dated 25th March 1935, whereby the appellant was awarded Rs. 8110. The appellant complains of this sum as inadequate; partly, but not solely, on the ground that a three-year period of limitation has been applied to his claim and not a six-year period under Art. 120 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act of 1908. On 12th March 1917 one Sohbat Khan, who was the owner of a considerable area of land in the village of Sheikhu in the Peshawar District, mortgaged 1011 kanals 8 marlas of his land to the appellant and his brother. The mortgage was for a term of 10 years and was a mortgage with possession, the sum secured being Rs. 44,233. Possession was not, in fact, taken by the mortgagees, but by a second document of even date the mortgaged land was leased by the mortgagees to Sohbat Khan for the same term at a rent of Rs. 1224 per annum which was taken to represent the yearly interest on the mortgage debt. The appellant, for reasons which need not here be detailed, b









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top