SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1939 Supreme(SC) 35

Baba Kartar Singh Bedi – Appellant
Versus
Dayal Das and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nevill, Barrow Rogers, Hy.S.L. Polak & Co., S. Hyam, B.K. Handoo, A.M. Dunne

Mr. Jayakar:-

This is an appeal from a decree of the High Court at Allahabad, dated 30th April 1934, which varied a decree of the Court of the Subordinate Judge at Saharanpur dated 29th April 1929. The appeal arises out of a suit by respondent 1 suing as the chela and successor under the terms of a will, for a declaration of his title and for possession and mesne profits of a certain immovable property, being a building situated in the Hindu Shrine of Hardwar, called Haveli Buriawali and certain rooms or outhouses appertaining to it. It appears that there was a gift of this property at some ancient time to one Atma Ram who apparently held it as his own property. After his death it went to his chela, Ashtabakar (it is not clear whether by will or by operation of law). After him it descended to his gurubhai or brother disciple Dhian Das and after his death it again went to the latter's chela Kishen Das. During his lifetime, Kishen Das held and enjoyed the property as his private and personal property. He took one Saheb Das, an infant of about 2½ years, as a chela. Kishen Das died in 1904, leaving Atar Kunwar (defendant 1) as his widow. It is not clear from the proceedings what the exa

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top