SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1942 Supreme(SC) 26

Nawab Habibulla – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income-tax, Bengal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
India Office., Solicitor, W.W. Box and Co., Sir Alfred Wort, J. Millard Tucker, C. Bagram, Sir Thomas Strangman

Lord Thankerton.:-

The appellant is the hereditary mutwalli of a wakf estate, and as such he draws remuneration, and the question in the appeal arises on a claim by him that the income thus received by him is exempt from taxation, which came before the High Court of Judicature at Fort William in Bengal on a reference by the respondent, at the appellant's request, under S. 66 (2), Income-tax Act, 1922, with a statement of the case and the opinion of the respondent rejecting the appellant's claim to exemption. The question of law referred to the Court was:

Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the sum of Rs. 49,500 received by the assessee as his remuneration as mutwalli was 'agricultural income' within the meaning of S.2 (1), Income-tax Act?

For the assessment year 1938-39, the appellant was assessed for income-tax purposes on an amount which included the sum of Rs. 49,500 under the head of salaries, which was the appellant's remuneration as mutwalli for the year of account and included both current salary and arrears. It is admitted that the income of the wakf estate from which the appellant's said remuneration was drawn, was "agricultural income." The wakf was created by








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top