SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1941 Supreme(SC) 3

Privy Council At Trinidad and Tobago
Lord Justice Goddard, Lord Justice Luxmoore , Justice Lord Romer, JJ.
Ernest Hugh Canning and others -Appellant
Versus
Soobran Partap and another -Resopndent
Privy Council Appeal No. 77 of 1939
Decided On : 12-03-1941

Advocates Appeared:
Teesdale and Co., Maples, Atlee , Druces, Cecil Turner, H. Wynn Parry, F.M. Winterbotham, Ch. Harman

Important Points

A company may be wound up on "just and equitable" grounds when it is unable to pay its debts and has lost its independent identity due to the total control and asset seizure by a single creditor, rendering it unable to carry on its business.

Subject

Company Law - Winding Up and Liquidation

Act Referred

Companies Ordinance Chap. 180: S.95 (1)

Headnote

(A) Companies Ordinance, Chap. 180 - Winding up of a company - Inability to pay debts - Just and equitable ground - Where a company is effectively controlled by a single creditor who has seized its assets and the company is unable to pay its debts or carry on business, the court may exercise its discretion to order winding up on just and equitable grounds.

(B) Receiver's duties - Failure to file abstracts of receipts and payments as prescribed by law under Section 95(1) of the Companies Ordinance.

Facts of the case:
A private company was wound up by the court following a petition by prospective and contingent creditors. A major creditor had provided a loan under onerous terms, securing a specific charge over leasehold properties and assets, and was appointed as the receiver of the business. This creditor exercised total control over the company. Subsequently, the creditor seized the company's machinery, engines, and plant under a power to distrain. It was alleged that the company was unable to pay its debts and that it was just and equitable that it should be wound up.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the creditor was de facto the company and had the power to bring it to an end. The company's independent identity had vanished, and any person dealing with the company was entirely dependent on the controlling creditor. The company was unable to pay its debts and, due to the seizure of its plant and equipment, was unable to carry on its business.

Issues: Whether the company was unable to pay its debts and whether it was just and equitable to order its winding up given the total control exerted by a single creditor.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that when a company's identity is subsumed by a controlling creditor and it lacks the means to pay its debts or operate its business, the discretion to wind up the company on just and equitable grounds is properly exercised. Concurrent findings of fact regarding the company's inability to function and pay debts justify the winding-up order.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • company law
    • winding up and liquidation
      • compulsory winding up
      • just and equitable ground

Lord Justice Luxmoore:-

On 21st October 1938 Boland J. ordered that the New Dome Oil Fields Ltd. (hereinafter called "the company") should be wound up by the Supreme Court of Trinidad and Tobago under the provisions of the Companies Ordinance Chap. 180 . This order was made upon a petition presented by leave of the Court by Soobran Partap and Ramessar Partap on 9th September 1938. On 9th November 1938 Manoel Joaquium de Silva, a creditor of the company who had opposed the making of the winding-up order appealed against such order, and on 23rd November 1938 the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Trinidad and Tobago dismissed this appeal on the ground that it was incompetent because de Silva had intervened in the winding-up proceedings subsequent to the date of the winding-up order. On 14th November 1938 Philomena Fernandez who claimed to be a creditor of the company and as such had opposed the making of the winding-up order gave notice of appeal against such order while on 6th December 1938 Ernest Hugh Canning and Jacinto Francisco Xavier who respectively claimed to be creditors of the company and had also opposed the making of the winding-up order gave separate notices of appeal against that order. On 17th December the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Trinidad and Tobago dismissed these appeals. On 17th January 1939 Philomena Fernandez Ernest Hugh Canning and Jacinto Francisco Xavier (hereinafter called "the appellants") obtained conditional leave to appeal to His Majesty the King in Council and on 16th May 1939 final leave to appeal as aforesaid was obtained.

The material facts are as follows: The company was incorporated as a private company under the Companies Ordinance Chap. 180 on 3rd May 1930. The nominal capital of the company is $100,000 of which $38,975 was stated to have been issued as paid up or credited as paid up but no information is to be found in the documents nor were counsel able to give any information at the hearing before this Board with regard to the number if any of the shares which had been issued for cash. The main object for which the company was established was to take over as a going concern the oil mining lease and operations including machinery and plant and other implements and tools used in such mining operations which were then vested in the Administrator-General of the Colony of Trinidad and Tobago as the representative of Alfred Ralph Sammy deceased who carried on business under the style of the Dome Oil Fields. The property taken over by the company included two leases dated respectively 18th February 1928 whereby certain oil petroleum mines and minerals were demised to the said Alfred Ralph Sammy for the respective terms of 21 years from 18th February 1928 subject to the payments of the rents and royalties and to the conditions and stipulations therein respectively mentioned. Each of the said leases reserved a power of re-entry if an assign of the said A. R. Sammy being a corporation should go into liquidation whether voluntary or compulsory except for the purpose of reconstruction or amalgamation. The lessors who granted the leases were Moorali Dar, the said Soobran Partap Sahoodar and Ramessar Partap. Both Moorali Dar and Sahoodar were dead before the petition for winding-up of the company was presented and at the date of such presentation Soobran Partap was the legal personal representative of each of such deceased persons. The respective properties comprised in the said leases were duly assigned to and vested in the company for all the unexpired residues of the respective terms originally created. It is admitted that after the acquisition of the leasehold properties the company was without funds to enable it to carry on the undertaking and consequently on 21st May 1930 the company borrowed $40,000 from the said de Silva.

The terms of the loan appear to have been extremely onerous, for the company gave as security therefor a specific charge upon (a) the unexpired terms under the leases





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top