SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 24

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
T.S. THAKUR, R. BANUMATHI, JJ.
Sudhir N. & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of Kerala & Ors. – Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 297-298 of 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.13121-13122 of 2011) With CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 299-300 of 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.11597-11598 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 301 of 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.11606 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 302-303 of 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.13123-13124 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 304-305 of 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.13126-13127 of 2011) AND CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 306-307 of 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.13130-13131 of 2011)
Decided On : 12-01-2015

MAIN POINTS
Regulation 9 of the MCI Regulations remains the only criteria for admission to medical education.
Section 5(4) of Kerala Medical Officers’ Admission to Postgraduate Courses under Service Quota Act, 2008 providing for selection on basis of inter se seniority instead of merit is not valid.
MCI Regulations framed under section 20 r/w section 33 of Medical Council of India Act are binding on States.
State, under Entry 25 List III , could not make a law on the subject covered by Central statute.
Merit and merit alone remains the criteria for admission. Seniority has no place in the scheme of MCI Regulations. However weightage could be given for rural service in terms of the third proviso to Regulation 9.

Headnote:(a) MCI Regulations – Regulation 9 – Admission to post graduate medical course – Regulation 9 is a complete code prescribing basis for determining eligibility of candidates, method to be adopted for determining the inter se merit being the only basis for such admissions – Weightage for rural service rendered by the candidates also provided – Section 5(4) of Kerala Medical Officers’ Admission to Postgraduate Courses under Service Quota Act, 2008 providing for selection on basis of inter se seniority instead of merit – Not valid. (Para 14)

       (b) Constitution of India – Article 246 and Entry 66, List I and Entry 25 List III – Legislation under Entry 66, List I or Entry 25 List III in scope of Union – State, under Entry 25 List III , could not make a law on the subject covered by Central statute – MCI Regulations framed under section 20 r/w section 33 of Medical Council of India Act are binding on States – States cannot make law/rule in conflict with or impinging upon the Regulations – In-service candidates constitute a separate class or category – However merit and merit alone can be the criteria for admission from any category – Section 5(4) of held not valid. (Para 16, 17, 18)

       (1995) 4 SCC 104; (1999) 7 SCC 120; (2003) 7 SCC 83 – Relied upon

       (c) Kerala Medical Officers’ Admission to Postgraduate Courses under Service Quota Act, 2008 – Section 5(4) – Higher medical education – Admission of in-service candidates – Seniority has no place in the scheme of MCI Regulations – However weightage could be given for rural service in terms of the third proviso to Regulation 9. (Para 20)

       Facts of the case:

       Writ Petitions were filed by the respondents challenging the constitutional validity of Section 5(4) of the Kerala Medical Officers’ Admission to Postgraduate Courses under Service Quota Act, 2008 in so far as it provides that ‘admission to postgraduate in-service quota shall be only on the basis of seniority’.

       The High Court has agreed in principle that admission to post-graduate courses can be made only on the basis of inter se seniority provided the candidates appear in the common entrance examination and qualify. High Court then held that inasmuch as Section 5(4) of the impugned enactment provides for the preparation of a select list of in-service medical officers based on seniority, such selection shall be made from among in-service medical officers only who have appeared in the common entrance test of post-graduate medical education and obtained the minimum eligibility bench mark in that test in terms of the MCI Regulations.

       Finding of the Court:

       Section 5(4) of Kerala Medical Officers’ Admission to Postgraduate Courses under Service Quota Act, 2008 is constitutionally not valid.

       Result:

       Appeals dismissed.

       

JUDGMENT

T.S. THAKUR, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. These appeals arise out of a judgment and order dated 30th March 2011 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Writ Petitions No.1014 of 2009 and 2610 of 2010 filed by the respondents whereby the High Court has allowed the said petitions with the direction that selection of in-service medical officers for post-graduate medical education under Section 5(4) of the Kerala Medical Officers’ Admission to Postgraduate Courses under Service Quota Act, 2008 (Kerala Act 29 of 2008), shall be made strictly on the basis of inter se seniority of the candidates who have taken the common entrance test for post-graduate medical education and have obtained the minimum eligibility bench mark in that test in terms of the Regulations framed by the Medical Council of India.

3. Forty percent of the seats available in the State of Kerala for post-graduate medical admission are reserved for in-service doctors serving in the Health Service Department, Medical College lecturers and doctors serving in the Employees State Insurance Department of the State. As per the practice prevalent before the enactment of the impugned legislation admissions against such reserved seats were made on the basis of seniority of in-service candidates in each category. Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations of Medical Council of India, 2000, however, made it mandatory for all candidates seeking admission to post-graduate medical courses to appear for a common entrance examination. The Regulations, inter-alia, provide that candidates who appears in the common entrance examination and secure 50% in the case of general category candidates and 40% in the case of SC/ST candidates alone shall be qualified for such admission. Consequently, even in-service candidates had to appear and qualify in the common entrance examination. Representations appear to have been received by the Government from many quarters pointing out that in-service candidates who were working around the clock for the benefit of the public even in remote rural areas could hardly find time to update their knowledge and compete with the general merit candidates so as to score the required 50% marks in the common entrance examination and to qualify for admission to any postgraduate course. Considering these representations, the Government decided to bring a legislation to overcome the difficulties faced by in-service candidates in the matter of getting admission to post-graduate courses. The legislation envisaged a quota for medical officers in the service of the State Government on such terms and conditions as may be prescribed. More importantly, in terms of Section 3 of Act No.29 of 2008 selection of medical officers to the postgraduate courses under the service quota was to be made by a Selection Committee called the Post Graduate Course Medical Selection Committee constituted under Section 4 of the said Act. Section 5 of the Act empowered the Government to set apart seats not exceeding 40% of the total seats available in the State quota for any academic year for selection of medical officers under ‘service quota’ for admission to post-graduate medical courses in medical colleges of the State. Sub-section (2) of Section 5 provided that the academic qualifications for admission to the postgraduate courses shall be an MBBS degree with a minimum of 50% marks besides other qualifications that may be prescribed. Sub-section (4) of Section 5 required the Post graduate Selection Committee to finalise the selection list directly based on the seniority of the in-service medical officers and following such other criteria as may be prescribed. Section 6 provided for grant of weightage for ‘rural area service’ or ‘difficult rural area service’ as the case may be, in the matter of selection of the candidates for admission. Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 to the extent they are relevant may be re-produced at this stage:

“3. Selection of Medical Officers for admission to Pos
























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top