SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 150

FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, A.M.SAPRE
NAGARAJA RAO – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent


JUDGMENT

ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J.

Leave granted.

2. This appeal is filed by the accused against the judgment and final order dated 25.04.2014 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Revision Petition No. 924 of 2009 whereby the learned single Judge of the High Court dismissed the revision petition and upheld the order dated 23.09.2008/01.10.2008 passed by the XVII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore in CC No. 2408 of 1995 convicting and sentencing the appellant-accused for the offences punishable under Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) and Section 52 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (hereinafter referred to as “the IPO Act”), which was confirmed by order dated 08.10.2009 passed by the XXI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No. 845 of 2008.

3. Facts of the case lie in a narrow compass.

4. The appellant-accused, at the relevant time, (1.3.1992 to 11.3.1993) was working as Sorting Assistant in Bangalore Packet Sorting Office, Head Record Office (Main Unit) at Bangalore. On the intervening night between 05.03.1993 and 06.03.1993, the appell






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top