SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 144

DIPAK MISRA, PRAFULLA C.PANT
SURINDER PAL KAUR – Appellant
Versus
SATPAL – Respondent


JUDGMENT

PRAFULLA C. PANT, J.

Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 7.5.2013, passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Civil Revision No. 5330 of 2002 (O&M) whereby said Court has dismissed the revision.

3. Briefly stated, the factual matrix of the case is that Rana Shiv Gopal Singh and Rani Amarjeet Kaur filed petition under Section 13 of Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1963 (Act 11 of 1973) for ejectment of Krishan Lal from the premises in question, i.e. House No. 8603-5, New No. 542, Block No. 6, Ambala City. After death of Rana Shiv Gopal Singh and Rani Amarjeet Kaur, present appellants were substituted as their legal heirs in the proceedings, and after death of Krishan Lal, present respondents were impleaded as his legal representatives.

4. It is pleaded by the appellants that they are landlords of House No. 8603-5, New No. 452, Block No. 6, Ambala City, and respondents are their tenants. The monthly tenancy started from the first date of every Calendar month, and the rate of rent was Rs. 70/- per month. It is alleged in the petition that the tenants failed to make payment of rent with effect from 1.6.1987, and committ



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top