SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 183

V.GOPALA GOWDA, R.BANUMATHI
NANJAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
RAMASAMY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R. BANUMATHI, J.

Delay condoned. Leave granted.

2. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 17.11.2011 in S.A. No.332 of 2005, whereby the High Court of Madras dismissed the second appeal affirming the judgment passed by the first appellate court which reversed the judgment of the trial Court allowing the respondents’ plea of specific performance of agreement of sale.

3. Brief facts, giving rise to the present appeal, are as follows :-Respondents have pleaded that on 30.09.1987, the appellant agreed to sell the suit property to the respondents for a sum of Rs.45,000/-and an agreement of sale was entered into and the appellant received a sum of Rs.25,000/-as advance on the same day and it was agreed that the balance amount shall be paid within a period of 2½ years and the sale be executed and to that effect a Sale Agreement (Ex. P1) was executed. As the appellant was unable to vacate the house on 21.03.1990, the time stipulated for performance was extended and Second Agreement (Ex. P-2) was executed, on which day, the respondents paid a further advance of Rs.15,000/-and the period was extended to another three years. According to the respondents, within the stipulated p














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top