SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 292

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ANIL R. DAVE, J. CHELAMESWAR, KURIAN JOSEPH, JJ.
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMON – PETITIONERS
VS.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. STF.CBI, MUMBAI – RESPONDENTS
REVIEW PETITION (CRL.) NO.474 OF 2013 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1728 OF 2007
Decided On : 09-04-2015

Headnote:Constitution of India – Article 136 – Review – All contentions and arguments on conviction and sentence – Already dealt with in detailed judgment – No error apparent on face of the record – No ground made our for review – Dismissed. (Para 1)

JUDGMENT

We have heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the review petitioner and the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent, at length. We have gone through the judgment sought to be reviewed and we have considered the arguments advanced on both sides. As requested, we have also gone through the judgment of the trial court, in order to appreciate the contention on conviction and sentence. We find that all the arguments advanced by the review petitioner have been considered in detail in the judgment which is sought to be reviewed. Hence, we do not find any error apparent on the face of record or any other ground so as to warrant interference in exercise of our review jurisdiction.

The review petition is hence dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top