J.CHELAMESWAR, R.K.AGRAWAL
Election Commission of India – Appellant
Versus
Bajrang Bahadur Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Chelameswar, J.
1. One Bajrang Bahadur Singh respondent no. 1 in SLP(C) No. 8850/2015 and the petitioner in Transferred Case No. 60/2015 (hereinafter being referred to as the petitioner for the sake of convenience) contested in the general elections held in the year 2012 to the UP Legislative Assembly from 315 Pharenda Assembly Constituency. On 6.3.2012, he was declared elected.
2. On 29.1.2015, the Governor of Uttar Pradesh made a declaration in exercise of the authority conferred under Article 192 of the Constitution of India that the petitioner incurred the disqualification stipulated under Section 9A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as "the R.P. Act"). Such a declaration came to be made on an undisputed finding of fact that the petitioner entered into four contracts (hereinafter referred to as the CULPRIT CONTRACTS for the sake of convenience) with the State of U.P. sometime in the year 2013 after his election to the Legislative Assembly and performed his obligations arising under the said contracts.
The Governor made the following order on 29.01.2015:
Therefore, I, Ram Naik, Governor, Uttar Pradesh, upon exercising the powers under
P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPEC)
Prakash Khandre v. Dr. Vijay Kumar Khandre
Konappa Rudrappa Nadgouda v. Vishwanath Reddy
Madhukar G.E. Pankakar v. Jaswant Chobbildas Rajani
M.V. Rajashekaran v. Vatal Nagaraj
Ashok Kumar Bhattacharyya v. Ajoy Biswas (1985)1 SCC 151 – Relied upon [Para 56]
Mohinder Singh Gill v. The Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi
Dr. Mahachandra Prasad Singh v. Chairman, Bihar Legislative Council
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.