A.K.SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, AHMEDABAD – Appellant
Versus
ESSAR STEEL LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.F. Nariman, J.
1. In this appeal we are concerned with the addition in the value for assessment to customs duty of charges paid by the respondent to Met Chem Canada Inc. for supply of technical services required for setting up and commissioning a plant for the manufacture of Hot Rolled Steel Coils in India. An agreement dated 13.4.1991 was entered into between the respondent and Met Chem Canada Inc. to associate Met Chem Canada Inc. as a technical consultant to render technical services in relation to implementation of a project to set up a plant in India for production of Hot Rolled Steel Coils and Strips. Under clause 1.1.6 `plant’ is defined as:
“1.1.6. “Plant” shall mean the integrated steel plant having an estimated annual capacity of Eight Hundred Thousand Tonnes (800,000 M.T.) of hot rolled steel coils and strips or such other enhanced capacity as may be agreed between the parties, to be located at Hazira, Gujarat, India and as described in Annexure 1 “PLANT UNITS’ attached hereto and made thereof;”
Project is defined as:
“1.1.8. “Project” shall mean the design, procurement, construction, erection and start-up of the plant.”
The most material clause of the agreemen
Collector of Customs (Preventive) v. Essar Gujarat Ltd.
Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Bhubaneswar, Orissa
Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata v. J.K. Corporation Limited
Commissioner of Customs v. Ferodo India (P) Ltd.
Commissioner of Customs (Port), Chennai v. Toyota Kirloskar Motor (P) Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.