SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 367

DIPAK MISRA, PRAFULLA C.PANT
S. Krishnamoorthy – Appellant
Versus
Chellammal – Respondent


Judgment

Prafulla C. Pant, J.

1. This appeal is directed against order dated 5.8.2009, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras, in Criminal O.P. No. 7989 of 2009 whereby said petition was allowed, and criminal proceedings initiated against Respondent Chellammal relating to offence punishable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short "the Act") are quashed by the High Court, exercising the powers Under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "the Code").

2. Heard learned Counsel for the Appellant. None appeared on behalf of the Respondent, though served.

3. Brief facts of the case are that Respondent Chellammal borrowed a sum of Rs. 2,20,000/- from Appellant S. Krishnamoorthy on 1.3.2007, and issued a post-dated (8.3.2007) cheque towards repayment of the loan. However, when the cheque was presented before the Bankers on 8.3.2007, the same was returned unpaid on the ground of insufficiency of funds. Consequently, a notice dated 17.3.2007 was sent by the Appellant to the Respondent demanding payment of the loan. Said notice was received by the Respondent on 22.3.2007. But, instead of making the payment, she sent reply dated 5.4.2007 f






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top