SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.K. SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, JJ.
M/S. SECURE METERS LTD. – APPELLANTS
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS NEW DELHI – RESPONDENTS
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7526 OF 2004
Decided On : 05-05-2015
(2005) 3 SCC 51 – Relied upon
Custom Tariff Act – Chapter heading 90 – Note 2(a) and 2(b) – Note 2(b) relates to 'other parts and accessories' – Meaning that it would apply to those parts and accessories for which Note 2(a) is inapplicable – Instantly, Note 2(a) squarely applies – The goods (LCD) will be classified in tariff item 9013.80. (Para 16)
Facts of the case:
The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of electricity meters.
In September 2000, the appellant imported a consignment consisting of LCD Modules (Printed Circuit Boards) and Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) from Hong Kong.
The appellant sought clearance of LCDs under Chapter Heading 9013.80 and claimed assessment at Nil rate (basic duty), 16% additional duty and 4% SAD.
The Deputy Commissioner, Customs (Adjudicating Authority) passed orders holding that LCDs were classifiable under Chapter Heading 9028.90 and not under 9013.80 as claimed by the appellant.
The aforesaid order of the Adjudicating Authority has been affirmed by the Commissioner as well as CESTAT.
Finding of the Court:
Impugned judgment is unsustainable in law.
Result: Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT
A.K. SIKRI, J.
The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of electricity meters. In September 2000, the appellant imported a consignment consisting of LCD Modules (Printed Circuit Boards) and Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) from Hong Kong. The classification of the LCD Module is not in dispute. The dispute in the instant case relates to classification of LCDs. The appellant sought clearance of LCDs under Chapter Heading 9013.80 and claimed assessment at Nil rate (basic duty), 16% additional duty and 4% SAD. As per the appellant, since the LCDs were classifiable under Chapter Heading 9013.80, in view of Notification No. 16/2000, and particularly Entry/S.No. 304 of the table of the said Notification, the goods classified under Heading 9013.80 attracted Nil rate of basic custom duty. That was the reason for claiming assessment at Nil rate insofar as basic duty is concerned. However, the case of the respondent/custom authorities is that on verification it was found that the goods were not simple liquid crystal. On the contrary, these were LCD Modules and Elastomeric LCD Displays and were part of Energy Meter. The relevant invoices also described the goods as “electronic part for energy meter”. The drawing and literature which were provided did not specify the purpose.
2) The Deputy Commissioner, Customs (Adjudicating Authority), thus, passed orders dated 31.08.2001 holding that LCDs were classifiable under Chapter Heading 9028.90 and not under 9013.80 as claimed by the appellant. For classifying the goods under the aforesaid category, recourse to Rule 3(c) of the General Rules for the Interpretation of the First Schedule – Import Tariff was taken by the Adjudicating Authority. The Deputy Commissioner observed that even if he considered the goods to be devices, then only those LCD devices/displays which do not constitute articles provided for more specifically in other heading would cover in Chapter Heading 9013 and, accordingly, he took the view that the goods are specific part of the electricity meter and, thus, classified the same under Chapter Heading 9028.90 as parts of electricity meter.
3) The aforesaid order of the Adjudicating Authority has been affirmed by the Commissioner as well as CESTAT resulting into dismissal of appeals filed by the appellant herein. The decision of CESTAT reveals that appellant relied upon its earlier decision in the case of CCE, Bombay v. Universal Information Commn. Equipment Ltd., 1997 (94) ELT 543. However, the Tribunal has held that the aforesaid decision is not applicable to the facts of the present case. The Tribunal has accepted the contention of the Revenue that the invoices issued by the supplier of the goods specifically mentioned that these were parts of electronic energy meters and even the appellant had admitted that these goods had to be issued as parts of energy meter.
4) Since the appellant claims that the LCDs fall under Chapter Heading 9013.80 and the argument of the Revenue is that these are rightly classified under Heading 9028.90, we may first take note of these Chapter Headings:
Tariff Item Description of Goods
| Tariff Item | Description of Goods |
| (1) | (2) |
| 9013 | Liquid Crystal Devices not constituting articles provided for more specifically in other headings; lasers, other than laser diodes; other optical appliances and instruments, not specified or included elsewhere in this Chapter |
| 9013.80 | Other devices, appliances and instruments; |
| 901380.10 | Liquid Crystal Devices (LCD) |
| 9028 | Gas, Liquid or electricity supply or production meters, including calibrating meters therefore |
| 9028.90 | Parts and accessories |
| 9028.90.10 | For electricity meters |
5) One thing is clear. Both the tariff items under which classification is sought by the appellant as well as the authorities, fall under Chapter 90. Therefore, it would
Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur v. Simplex Mills Co. Ltd.
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.