SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 388

A.K.SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
SECURE METERS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS NEW DELHI – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.K. SIKRI, J.

The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of electricity meters. In September 2000, the appellant imported a consignment consisting of LCD Modules (Printed Circuit Boards) and Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) from Hong Kong. The classification of the LCD Module is not in dispute. The dispute in the instant case relates to classification of LCDs. The appellant sought clearance of LCDs under Chapter Heading 9013.80 and claimed assessment at Nil rate (basic duty), 16% additional duty and 4% SAD. As per the appellant, since the LCDs were classifiable under Chapter Heading 9013.80, in view of Notification No. 16/2000, and particularly Entry/S.No. 304 of the table of the said Notification, the goods classified under Heading 9013.80 attracted Nil rate of basic custom duty. That was the reason for claiming assessment at Nil rate insofar as basic duty is concerned. However, the case of the respondent/custom authorities is that on verification it was found that the goods were not simple liquid crystal. On the contrary, these were LCD Modules and Elastomeric LCD Di







































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top