SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 409

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J.CHELAMESWAR, MADAN B.LOKUR, KURIAN JOSEPH, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

The prayer made by the learned Attorney General for India for disposing of the issue with reference to the need of re-visiting the two judgments rendered by this Court in Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association vs. Union of India (1993) 4 SCC 441, and Special Reference No. 1 of 1998 Re: (1998) 7 SCC 739 to be decided first, as a preliminary issue, before hearing the main case on merits, is declined.

As an interim measure, we direct the appointment of Additional Judges in High Courts, already in office, to be continued for a period of three months or till the date of their superannuation, whichever is earlier, during the pendency of the matters in hand, till their disposal.

With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, hearing of the case is deferred to 08.06.2015.

To be listed on 08.06.2015 as part-heard at 10.30 a.m.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top