SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 416

T.S.THAKUR, R.K.AGRAWAL, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Abdul Razak – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka Rep. By SHO, Hutti PS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

T.S. THAKUR, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. These appeals by special leave call in question a judgment and order dated 19th November, 2012 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Gulbarga whereby Criminal Appeal No.1926 of 2007 has been allowed, judgment and order of the Trial Court acquitting the appellants set aside, and the appellants convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years under Section 304 Part II read with Section 34 IPC. A fine of Rs.5,000/-each and a default sentence of imprisonment for a period one year has also been awarded to the appellant.

3. The prosecution case in brief is that three years before the date of incident CW-11 Md. Shafi sold two acres of land to CW-2 Lingappa. The accused-appellants herein were upset by the said sale transaction and are alleged to be picking up quarrels with CW-2 besides causing obstruction in the free flow of water to the fields owned by the complainant from a distributory at Narayanapur. The appellants are alleged to be insisting that they will let water for irrigation flow only if the land purchased by the complainant was transferred in their favour. Lingappa was on that count coerced to








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top