SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla and Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ.
Balkar Singh - Appellants
Vs.
State of Haryana - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 606 of 2008
Decided On: 17.11.2014
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302, 120, 34 and 201 – Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 25 – Alleged Conspiracy – Prosecution and Mainly Focused – Allegation of Conspiracy – Present appeal was preferred Appellant was listed along with Criminal Appeal above appeals were taken up for hearing togetherlearned Senior Counsel appearing for Appellant herein submitted that having served their sentence nothing survived in their appeals and said four appeals were dismissed as having become infructuous present appeal filed by was convicted for killing of one Satinder Sekhon of Ambala in conspiracy offences – Held, Court and Division Bench of High Court allegation of conspiracy levelled was ruled remained against earlier conspiracy alleged to have been planned at Kala Amb was held to be not established were concerned there was no iota of evidence to link them to any act of conspiracy leave alone place time and nature of conspiracy once charge of conspiracy ingredients to support the theory of conspiracy was totally lacking either in the form of material evidence or otherwise – None of circumstance had any iota of relevance to the alleged conspiracy either at instance of against whom both the Courts gave a clean chit nothing to suggest that A-10 held a conspiracy with other hand specific case of prosecution was that at the instance head conspirator was found to have played no role in whole case there is no scope to pin down A-10 alone to theory of conspiracy – Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT
Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.
1. The present appeal was preferred by A-1 to A-4 in which A-10 is the Appellant was listed along with Criminal Appeal Nos. 1005 of 2010, 992 of 2010, 986 of 2010 and SLP (Crl.) No. 270 of 2009. All the above appeals were taken up for hearing together. Mr. Sushil Kumar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Appellant herein submitted that A-1 to A-4 having served their sentence, nothing survived in their appeals and, therefore, the said four appeals were dismissed as having become infructuous. The present appeal filed by A-10 was, therefore, heard. A-10 was convicted for the killing of one Satinder Sekhon of Ambala in conspiracy with A-1 to A-4 for the offences Under Section 120B read with Section 302of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'Indian Penal Code').
2. The brief facts which are required to be stated are that the deceased was the owner of a petrol pump which he started on 08.03.1992. The occurrence took place on 16.07.1994 at 11.30 a.m. On that day the deceased went to Dhillon Service Station, another petrol pump along with his brother Harinder Singh Sekhon (PW-22) and an employee by the name of Surjit Singh (PW-25). They travelled in a Maruti Car bearing Registration No. HNA 7878. The deceased went to the said petrol pump, which was owned by Ravinder Singh Dhillon (PW-23) who was an eye witness to the occurrence for making payment for the mobil oil which he purchased from there. The deceased along with his brother was sitting inside the cabin of the petrol pump and was conversing with PW-23. A-1 to A-4 i.e. Gurdev Singh, Sohan Singh, Naib Singh and Vakil Singh went to the said petrol pump in a Maruti 800 bearing fake Registration No. CHO1-J-9846 (real Registration No. HR-34-0010) owned by Swaran Singh (PW-36). Two of them asked for petrol and when they were told that the petrol was out of stock, the said two persons went inside the office cabin and asked for some coolant. While PW-23 was requesting the salesman Rajneesh Kumar Dutta (PW-24) to give the coolant, one of the two intruders who was armed with a knife started stabbing the deceased while the other one caught hold of the deceased from behind. In the meanwhile, the two other occupants of the car, one of whom was armed with a gun and another with a danda, also entered the office cabin and the one who was holding a gun posed a threat not to raise any alarm and one of them remarked that the deceased had been taught a lesson for running the petrol pump. The deceased collapsed and the four assailants escaped in the car in which they had come. The murder was thus witnessed by PWs-22, 23, 24 and 25. The FIR was registered on the same day i.e., 16.07.1994 at 2 p.m. for the offence Under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code without making a mention to any names in it.
3. On 22.07.1994, A-1 to A-4 surrendered. On 24.07.1994, Inspector Rishal Singh (PW-53) arrested A-5, A-6, A-7 and A-8 i.e. Balkar Singh Gujjar, Gulzar Singh, Mangal Singh and Jasbir Singh. On 27.07.1994, Appellant (A-10) and Kamaljit Singh (A-11) were arrested by PW-53. On 23.07.1994, Dalbir Singh (A-9) surrendered. On 29.07.1994, Faquir Chand (A-12) was arrested and on 08.08.1994, the case was handed over to the Central Bureau of Investigation (hereinafter referred to as 'CBI'). The CBI commenced their investigation on 09.08.1994. Subsequently, Darshan Singh (A-13) was arrested on 15.08.1994. On 22.10.1994, Nirmal Singh (A-14) surrendered. In the meantime, on 15.10.1994, the charge-sheet was filed. Altogether 14 accused were charged for the offences Under Sections 120B, 302 read with Section 34, Indian Penal Code. There were offences against some of the accused under the Arms Act, 1959 as well as Under Section 201, Indian Penal Code. The trial Court convicted A-1 to A-4, A-10 and A-11 for the offences Under Sections 120B and 302 read with Section 34, Indian Penal Code. The rest of the accused, including A-14, were acquitted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.