SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 443

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dipak Misra, Prafulla C. Pant, JJ.
Nayankumar Shivappa Waghmare - Appellant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1352 of 2009
Decided On: 13.02.2015

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: Amol Chitale, Aniruddha P. Mayee, Charudatta Mahindrakar and A. Selvin Raja, Advs.

Headnote:

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) - Appeal against conviction - Acquittal of order - Imprisonment - Appellant was working in Finance Section - He was handling cases of General Provident Fund and pension cases of retired members of staff - PW-10 who served as Chief Seiko with Integrated Child Development Scheme opted for her voluntary retirement due to her physical ailments in July - She submitted her pension papers - She was issueless widow - Her brother PW-9 who was an ex-serviceman was requested by her to pursue her papers - He used to work with a private company - PW-9 between November to January went several times to office to make enquiries regarding her sisters pension and GPF papers - Held, It can be stated without any fear of contradiction that corruption is not to be judged by degree for corruption mothers disorder destroys societal will to progress accelerates undeserved ambitions kills conscience jettisons glory of institutions paralyses economic health of a country corrodes sense of civility and mars marrows of governance - It is worth noting that immoral acquisition of wealth destroys energy of people believing in honesty and history records with agony how they have suffered - For reasons as discussed after going through record of case and considering rival submissions of Counsel for parties court find no reasons to interfere with impugned order passed by High Court convicting and sentencing Appellant Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Appeal is liable to be dismissed - Appeal dismissed

Judgment

Prafulla C. Pant, J.

1. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 6.2.2009 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 135 of 1997 by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Bench at Aurangabad) whereby said Court has reversed the acquittal recorded by Special Judge, Osmanabad, in Special Case No. 3 of 1993 and convicted the present Appellant Nayankumar Shivappa Waghmare Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and directed to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/-, and in default of payment of fine, six months further rigorous imprisonment is directed to be served.

2. We heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. According to prosecution, the Appellant was working in the Finance Section of Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad. He was handling the cases of General Provident Fund (GPF) and pension cases of retired members of staff. PW-10 Mirabai N. Deshpande, who served as Chief Sevika with the Integrated Child Development Scheme at Bhoom, opted for her voluntary retirement due to her physical ailments, in July, 1992. She submitted her pension papers. She was issueless widow. Her brother PW-9 Anant Deshmukh, who was an ex-serviceman, was requested by her to pursue her papers. He used to work with a private company in Pune. PW-9 Anant Deshmukh, between November, 1992 to January, 1993, went several times to the office of Zilla Parishad to make enquiries regarding her sister's pension and GPF papers. The Appellant, who was working in said office, told him that the pension papers were searched but could not be located. On this, PW-9 went to Bhoom and obtained outward number of forwarding letter addressed to Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad along with which the pension papers of Mirabai were sent. Thereafter, pension and GPF papers were located, and the Appellant told PW-9 Anant Deshmukh (complainant) to obtain 'No Dues Certificate' from Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Bhoom. He also disclosed the complainant that there was missing entry in respect of year 1987-88 in the GPF statement. On this, the complainant brought letter of her sister stating that she was ready to accept the amount of GPF excluding the missing credits of the year 1987-88. 'No Dues Certificate' from the Block Development Officer was also obtained and submitted to the office of the Zilla Parishad. When again contacted, the Appellant told Anant Deshmukh that GPF clearance would require further 2-3 months, but if the complainant pays Rs. 1,000/- to him, it can be done within 8-10 days. Reluctantly, Anant Deshmukh gave Rs. 200/- to the Appellant, who asked him to contact after five-six days with rest of the amount. On 30.1.1993, complainant met the Appellant Nayankumar Shivappa Waghmare (accused) at 10.45 a.m. The Appellant told him that the work has progressed, and papers are lying for signatures of the authority concerned, and asked him to come at 2.30-3.00 p.m. with balance amount. The complainant told that he could arrange Rs. 300/- only and remaining Rs. 500/- be allowed to be paid when the GPF amount is encashed. The Appellant asked the complainant that further Rs. 1,000/- would be required separately for pension work which would take about two-three months time. On this, complainant PW-9 Anant Deshmukh went to Anti Corruption Bureau and met PW-12 P.I. Nandkumar Gadade, and complained about the corruption. PW-12 got the complaint reduced into writing whereafter panch witnesses, namely, PW-1 Uttam Bhutekar and PW-3 Sahebrao Wanve, were called from the Irrigation office. The written complaint was read over to the witnesses in the presence of Anant Deshmukh. A trap was laid by team led by Deputy Superintendent of Police Mr. Shetkar to apprehend the Appellant on the same day as the Appellant had asked the complainant to come with money in the afternoon. After applying anthracene powder in the three currency notes which were to be hande


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top