SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 483

DIPAK MISRA, PRAFULLA C.PANT
Lisamma Antony – Appellant
Versus
Karthiyayani – Respondent


Judgment

Prafulla C. Pant, J.

1. These appeals have arisen out of judgment and decree dated 6.6.2013, passed by the High Court of Kerala in Regular Second Appeal No. 188 of 2013, whereby said appeal was allowed by the High Court. By the order dated 7.2.2014, passed by the High Court, Review Petition No. 611 of 2013 in second appeal was dismissed.

2. We heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the papers on record.

3. Briefly stated, Plaintiff Annamma Thomas (predecessor-in-title of the present Appellants) instituted suit No. 415 of 2005 before the Principal Munsiff, Alappuzha, for injunction restraining the Defendants from trespassing into the property mentioned in the schedule of the plaint, and from demolishing its boundary. It is pleaded in the plaint that the Plaintiff Annamma and her two children Mathew and Benny were the absolute owners of the property, which they purchased vide Sale Deed No. 824/80 dated 3.5.1980. They further pleaded that they were in possession of the property. It is also pleaded by the Plaintiffs that the Defendants are the Kudikidappukari (persons holding tenancy rights) of the previous owners to the extent of 10 cents of property (1/10thof an acre)






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top