SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 553

V.GOPALA GOWDA, R.BANUMATHI
ING Vysya Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Heard Learned Counsel for the parties. The Appellant bank, aggrieved by the rejection of its petition filed Under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the High Court of Judicature at Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench declined to quash the order dated 24.02.2005, passed by the learned trial Judge in taking cognizance against the Appellant Bank for the alleged offence Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', is before this Court questioning the correctness of the aforesaid orders urging various legal contentions.

2. The brief facts in nutshell to appreciate the rival legal submissions made by Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde, Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants and Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2, with a view to find out as to whether the impugned judgment and order warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its appellate jurisdiction. The Appellant bank has issued a pay order in the name of Citi Bank, Account No. 0007849141 of Jaya Enterprises. Placing strong reliance upon this document, Learned Counsel for the Appellants submitted that the said pay order is neither a chequ














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top