A.K.SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Asahi India Safety Glass Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A.K. Sikri, J.
1. The Respondent herein is engaged in the manufacture of Toughened (Tempered) and Laminated Safety Glass for Automobiles falling under Chapter Heading 7004.10 and 7004.20 respectively of the First Schedule to the Central excise Tariff Act, 1985. For the manufacture of the glass of aforesaid nature, the Respondent has been supplying float glass which is the main raw material of the Respondent's product. On this the Respondent has also been availing claim of MODVAT credit of duty paid on the aforesaid raw material, Under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules').
2. Show cause notices dated 1.9.2002, 14.12.2000 and 29.6.2001 were issued by the Department to the Respondent alleging therein that the Respondent had availed MODVAT credit of inputs that were inherently defective and were neither used nor usable in or in relation to the manufacture of the final products'. In these show cause notices, on the aforesaid basis the Department demanded back the duty in a sum of Rs. 3,63,79,483, Rs. 2,2,57,353 and Rs. 28,53,875/- respectively. The Respondent gave reply to the said show cause notices.
3. At the same time the Respondent als
Union of India and Ors. v. IND. Swift Laboratories Ltd. 2011 (4) SCC 635;
Collector of Central excise v. Rajasthan State Chemical works 1991 (55) E.L.T. 444 S.C.
J.K. Cotton Mills v. S.T. Officer 1965 (1) SCR 900;
Standard Fireworks Industries v. Collector 1987 (28) E.L.T. 56 (S.C.);
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.