SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 564

RANJAN GOGOI, N.V.RAMANA
Madalappura Kunhikoya – Appellant
Versus
Kunnamgalam Beebi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Delay in filing application for substitution of deceased Respondent No. 9 is condoned. Applications for substitution of deceased Respondents Nos. 31 and 9 are allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. This is an Defendants' appeal against a decree by which suit of the Plaintiffs for title and possession has been decreed. The aforesaid decree has been affirmed in first appeal by the High Court.

3. The case of the Plaintiffs in the suit filed is to the effect that they are the members of Kunnamgalam tavazhy which was a branch of Pooradam tharwad. According to the Plaintiffs one Pookoya Haji was the last surviving member of the Pooradam tavazhy and the Defendants are the wife and children of aforesaid Pookoya Haji. The Plaintiffs allege that as per custom prevailing in the Island, the properties belonging to the tharwad in the island are called Velliyazhicha properties (joint family properties) (hereinafter referred to as "the Friday properties") and Vyazhicha properties (self-acquired properties) (hereinafter referred to as "the Thursday properties"). The Friday properties belong to the tharwad and are to revert to the tharwad on the death of last surviving member of a bran









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top