SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 646

FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, SHIVA KIRTI SINGH
Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Konark Power Projects Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Heard Mr. K.V. Viswanathan, learned senior Counsel for the Appellant and Mr. G. Umapathy for Respondent No. 1. Appellant is a State Electricity Board. Respondent No. 1 had entered into a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. (KPTCL) for supply of power by an agreement dated 04.04.2002. Paragraphs 5.1 and 5.2 of the said Agreement are relevant for our purpose, which are as under:

"5.1 Monthly Energy Charges: Corporation shall for the Delivered Energy pay, for the first 10 years from the date of signing of Agreement to the Company every month during the period commencing from the Commercial Operation Date on the basis of the base price applicable for the year 1994-95 at the rate of Rs. 2.25 (Rupees Two and twenty five paise) per kilowatt hour (the tariff) for energy delivered to the Corporation at the Meeting Point with an escalation to the Corporation at the Metering Point with an escalation at a rate of 5% per annum over the tariff applicable for the previous year as per guidelines issued by the Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources of the Gol.

5.2 From the 11th year onwards, from the date of signing of Agreement, Corpo













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top