SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 602

A.K.SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
SRF Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs – Respondent


ORDER

1. In both these appeals, identical question of law has come up for consideration. For sake of convenience, we will take note of the facts appearing in Civil Appeal No. 9440 of 2003.

2. The Appellant herein had imported Nylon Filament Yarn of 210 deniers falling under Chapter 54 of the Customs Tariff. The Appellant claimed nil rate of additional duty of customs by relying on exemption in terms of Serial No. 122 of Notification No. 6/2002-CE dated 01.03.2002. The Deputy Commissioner of Customs passed orders dated 12.04.2002 holding that the Appellant was not entitled for exemption from payment of additional duty/Countervailing Duty (CVD) since it was not fulfilling condition No. 20 of the aforesaid Notification. The Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed the aforesaid order of the Deputy Commissioner and dismissed the appeal of the Appellant vide orders dated 12.09.2002. In further appeal to the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'CEGAT'), even the CEGAT has affirmed the order of the authorities below and dismissed the appeal.

3. Entry/Serial No. 122 in the Notification No. 6/2002 reads as under-

S. No. Chapter or heading No. or sub-heading
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top