SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 527

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, N.V.RAMANA
Anil Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Leave granted. The Appellants preferred this appeal against order dated 11.11.2013 read with order dated 9.12.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 2625 of 2012. By the said order, the Court refused to entertain the petition filed by the Appellants Under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. On notices, apart from State of Uttar Pradesh, the complainant-Respondent No. 2 appeared in the Court. As the Appellants and the complainant intended to settle the dispute amicably, pursuant to their suggestion, this Court allowed the Appellants and the second Respondent-complainant to file a settlement agreement.

3. A joint application on behalf of the Appellants and the second Respondent has been filed enclosing the copy of Settlement Deed dated 14th January, 2015, the relevant portion of which reads as follows:-

"And Whereas the parties hereto have decided to settle the dispute leading to registration of aforesaid Check F.I.R. No. 816 of 2009 (Case Crime No. 1068 of 2009 and Criminal Crime No. 12175 of 2001























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top