SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 514

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, N.V.RAMANA
Arjun Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Leave granted. This appeal has been preferred by Appellant against the order dated 27th June, 2013 in CWP No. 1553/2013 passed by the High Court of H.P. at Shimla.

2. The only question that arises for determination is whether the Appellants are entitled for regular appointment in view of the fact that they were appointed after following all procedure of selection including recommendation of the Public Service Commission and are continuing in service since long.

3. The factual matrix of the case is as follows:

In exercise of power conferred Under Section 79(C) read with Section 15of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, the H.P. State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as 'Electricity Board') by notification dated 1st November, 2006, repealed the 1975 Recruitment and promotion regulations for the post of Assistant Accounts Officer Class-I (Gazetted)' and framed new regulations known as 'The H.P. Electricity Board Recruitment and Promotion Regulations for the post of Assistant Accounts Officer, 2006'. The said regulation prescribes the total number of posts, scale o










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top