SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 816

T.S.THAKUR, V.GOPALA GOWDA, R.BANUMATHI
SAKHARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R. BANUMATHI, J.

Leave granted.

2. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 01.08.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No.935 of 2004 whereby the High Court partly allowed the appeal thereby modifying the conviction of the appellant-Sakharam under Section 307 IPC to Section 325 IPC and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-with default clause.

3. Briefly stated case of the prosecution is that complainant-Ramnath (PW-1) lives in village-Devrimaal and runs a flourmill and also an agriculturist. On 09.06.2002 at about 6.00 p.m., when Ramnath-PW-1 was working at his flourmill, Raju came to PW-1’s flourmill and asked him whether Ramnath called Jogi Lodhi for a meal in Jhalar function to which the complainant replied in the negative and on this issue there was a wordy altercation between them. At about 7.30 p.m., when Ramnath was returning back from his flourmill in front of one Prahlad Vishwakarma’s house, Raju wrongfully restrained him and started quarrelling with him. At that time Vipatlal-grandfather of Raju came thereon with lathi and hit the complainant-Ramnath’s head. On










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top