A.K.SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
PARISONS AGROTECH (P) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Judgment
A.K. Sikri, J.
Vide Notification No.39 (RE-2007)/2004-2009 dated 16.10.2007, the Central Government (respondent No.1 herein) prohibited the import of palm oil through Kochi port in Kerala. It was followed by another Notification No.63 (RE-2007)/2004-2009 dated 24.12.2007 whereby the import of palm oil has been prohibited through all the ports of Kerala. These Notifications were issued by the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by Section 5 read with Section 3 of The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). All the appellants filed separate writ petitions challenging the validity of these Notifications on the ground that they were ultra vires the provisions of Section 3 of the Act and, in any case, unconstitutional as offending Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The writ petitions filed by them were dismissed by learned single Judge. Matter was carried in appeal before the Division Bench of Kerala High Court, but unsuccessfully, as these appeals have also been dismissed.
It is clear from the above that the issue involved in all these appeals are identical. This was the reason for clubbing these appeals so
Kalindi Woolen Mills (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
Union of India v. Dinesh Engineering Corporation
Asif Hameed v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
State of Orissa v. Gopinath Dash
Gopal Narain v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Premier Tyres Limited v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation
Balco Employees’ Union (Regd.) v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.