SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M. Y. EQBAL, KURIAN JOSEPH, JJ.
Sandu (D) by Lrs. – Appellants
Versus
Gulab (D) by Lrs. and others – Respondent
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3470 OF 2006
Decided On : 04-09-2015
(b) Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 – Section 7, Proviso – High Court setting aside Commissioner’s order as being time barred – Time limit of three years prescribed for suo motu action by Commissioner – Not applicable in case of Government sanction – In case of Government sanction, proceedings can be initiated even beyond three years but within reasonable time – Instantly Government according sanction for revision on 10.05.1982 and Commissioner initiating revisional proceedings in 1985 – Held, proceedings initiated within reasonable time. (Para 9)
(c) Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 – Section 4, 5A – Restoration of land to tribal owner – Owner who sold the land to non-tribal not interested in repurchasing – Even then Collector cannot drop the restoration proceedings – Collector has to divest the non-tribal transferee of the tribal land and pass a further order vesting the land in the State Government for being distributed to the other deserving tribals. (Para 10)
Facts of the case:
The Assistant Collector, Jalgaon in the State of Maharashtra initiated proceedings under Section 4 of the Act as per notice dated 03.12.1975 in respect of land Gat. No. 71 measuring 2 hectares and 7 ares on the ground that the land originally belonged to the tribal and as the same was transferred to a non-tribal after 1957. It was found that the land was sold by the tribal to the non-tribal on 12.07.1971. However, restoration was declined and order dated 31.12.1975 was passed dropping the proceedings on the ground that the tribal was not prepared to purchase the land.
in 1985, the Additional Commissioner, Nasik initiated suo motu proceedings under Section 7 of the Act, after the Government granted the sanction under Section 7 of the Act by letter dated 10.05.1982. In the order dated 28.03.1989, the revisional authority entered a finding that the land was liable to be restored. The order dated 31.12.1975 passed by the Assistant Collector, Jalgaon was set aside.
The order passed by the revisional authority was challenged before the High Court.
Neither the State of Maharashtra nor the Collector, who passed the order under Section 4 of the Act or the revisional authority, was impleaded as parties in the Petition. Only the tribals were made respondents.
High Court set aside the order of the Commissioner as being time barred.
Finding of the Court:
The proceeding initiated by the Commissioner was within reasonable time.
Result: Petition remitted back to High Court.
JUDGMENT :
KURIAN, J.:
1. The Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) was introduced to provide for the restoration of certain lands to persons belonging to the scheduled tribes. It has been notified on 01.11.1975. Under Section 4 of the Act, the restoration is contemplated in respect of transactions on or after 1st day of April, 1957. Section 4 reads as follows:
“4. Restoration of lands of persons belonging to Scheduled Tribes. Where any land of a Tribal is, at any time on or after the 1st day of April 1957 and before the 6th day of July 1974, purchased or deemed to have been purchased or acquired under or in accordance with the provisions of the relevant tenancy law by a non-Tribal-transferee or where any acquisition has been regularised on payment of penalty under such law and such land is in possession of a non-Tribal transferee and has not been put to any non-agricultural use on or before the 6th day of July 1974, then the Collector shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, either suo motu at any time or on an application by the Tribunal made 1[within thirty years from the 6th July 2004] and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, direct that the land shall, subject to the provisions of subsection (4) of section 3, be restored to the Tribal free form all encumbrances and that the amount of purchase price or a proportionate part thereof, if any, paid by such non-Tribal-transferee in respect of such lands in accordance with the relevant tenancy law shall be refunded to such non-Tribal-transferee either lump sum or in such annual installments not exceeding twelve (with simple interest at 4½ per cent. per annum) as the Collector may direct. The provisions of clauses (d), (e), (f) and (g) of sub-section (4) of section 3 shall, so far as may be, apply in relation to the recovery of the amount from the Tribal and payment thereof to the non-Tribal-transferee and the persons claiming encumbrances, if any :
Provided that, where land is purchased or acquired by a non-Tribal-transferee before the 6th day of July1974, after such transferee was rendered landless by reason of acquisition of his land for a public purpose, then only half the land so purchased or acquired shall be restored to the Tribal-transferor.”
2. Under Section 5A of the Act, lands which belonged to the tribals and coming under the purview of the Act which cannot be restored to the original tribals, vest in Government and such lands are to be granted to other tribals subject to prescribed restrictions.
“5A. (1) Where any land (not being land acquired in exchange), which is liable to be restored to a Tribal-transferor under sub-section (1) of section 3 cannot be so restored either on account of the failure of the Tribal-transferor to give an undertaking referred to in sub-section (3) of section 3 or for any reason whatsoever or where any land referred to in section 4 cannot be restored to the Tribal by reason of such Tribal expressing, during the inquiry held by the Collector, his unwillingness to refund the purchase price or proportionate part thereof to the non-Tribal-transferee, as required by the said section 4, or for any other reason, then, the Collector may, subject to rules, if any, made in that behalf, by order in writing direct that the land shall, with effect from the date of the order, be deemed to have been acquired and vest in the State Government free from all encumbrances.
(2) On such vesting of the land, the non-Tribal-transferee shall be entitled to receive from the State Government an amount equal to 48 times the assessment of the land, plus the value of the improvements, if any, made by the non-Tribal-transferee therein. The provisions of clauses (b) and (c) of sub-section (4) of section 3 shall mutatis mutandis apply for determining the value of improvements and for apportionment of the encumbrances, if any, on the land between the non-Tribal-tr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.