ANIL R.DAVE, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
AKASH EDUCATION & DEVELOPMENT TRUST – Respondent
Judgment
Anil R. Dave, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and considered the facts of the case.
3. Upon perusal of the impugned judgment delivered by the High Court, we find that the High Court has given direction to the appellant-Medical Council of India to carry out inspection of the respondent-institution within a particular time.
4. In our opinion, such a direction could not have been given in view of the fact that the inspection at a belated stage is against the provisions of the Medical Council of India Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999. Moreover, in view of the law laid down by this Court in Priya Gupta Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors. [(2012) 7 SCC 433] and Royal Medical Trust (Regd.) & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Anr. [(2015) 9 Scale 68] such a direction is not justifiable.
5. In the circumstances, we quash the direction and set aside the impugned judgment delivered by the High Court. The appeals stand disposed of as allowed with no order as to costs.
6. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.