Jasbir Singh vs Tara Singh - 2015 Supreme(SC) 897

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2015 Supreme(SC) 897

KURIAN JOSEPH, ARUN MISHRA
Jasbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Tara Singh – Respondent

Judgment

Kurian, J.

Leave granted.

2. The de facto complainant has come up in appeal aggrieved by the alleged lenient view taken by the High Court in the impugned judgment with regard to the sentence.

3. The party-respondents were tried under Sections 466, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’) for having committed a serious offence of forgery of documents in order to grab the property of one Harbans Singh. The trial court imposed the following sentence:

“Name of Accused	Section	R.I. Fine (Rs.)	In Default
Partapa	466 IPC	2 years 500/-	One month
Tara Singh	466/120-B	1 year 500/-	One month
	467 IPC	3 years 1000/-	Two months
	468 IPC	3 years 1000/-	Two months
	471 IPC	2 years 500/-	One months
Bhajan Singh	467 IPC	3 years 1000/-	Two months
	468 IPC	3 years 1000/-	Two months
Charan Dass	467 IPC	3 years 1000/-	Two months
	468 IPC	3 years 1000/-	Two months
Dalbir Singh	467 IPC	3 years 1000/-	Two months
	468 IPC	3 years

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2015 Supreme(SC) 897

KURIAN JOSEPH, ARUN MISHRAJasbir Singh – AppellantVersusTara Singh – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

KURIAN JOSEPH, ARUN MISHRA
Jasbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Tara Singh – Respondent