A.K.SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
SPENTEX INDUSTRIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE – Respondent
Judgment
A.K. Sikri, J.
In all these appeals, the basic question of law which arises for consideration is as to whether or not the manufacturer/exporter is entitled to rebate of the excise duty paid both on the inputs and on the manufactured product, when excise duty is paid on a manufactured product and also on the inputs which have gone into manufacturing the product and such manufactured product is exported?
2) We may point out at the outset that, as per the scheme provided by the relevant Rules framed under the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') two options are admissible in respect of exemption from excise duty which is to be given when the goods manufactured are meant for export and are actually exported. A manufacturer/exporter can either export the said goods without payment of duty by executing a bond to the effect that goods are meant for export and would be actually exported and also undertakes to satisfy other stipulated conditions, to earn the exemption from payment on excise duty. Other option is to pay the duty on intermediate products and/or final products and thereafter claiming rebate from the Government once the goods are actually export
R & B Falcon (A) Pty Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Desh Bandhu Gupta and Co. v. Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd.
Union of India v. Kamlabhai Harjiwandas Parekh
State of Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala
J. Jayalalitha v. Union of India
Mazagaon Dock Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax and Excess Profits Tax
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.