SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 1328

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, D.K.JAIN
MOHINDER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
HIRA NAND SINDHI (GHORIWALA) – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

The counsel for the respondent though served but not appeared. This petition is filed against the order of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. In addition to the award passed by the Tribunal the High Court was pleased to grant Rs. 50,000 for loss of consortium with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of the passing of the order i.e. 18-8-2004 till the date of realisation instead from the date of filing of the petition i.e. 20-5-1982. The petitioner claims that she should have been allowed to have interest from 20-5-1982 i.e. from the date of filing of the petition before the Tribunal.

We, therefore, allow interest @ 9 per cent per annum on the amount of Rs. 50,000 from the date of filing of the petition i.e. from 20-5-1982. The special leave petitions are disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top