SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dipak Misra, Prafulla C. Pant, JJ.
Vishwanath Dadu Gurav Since deceased through LRs & others - Appellants
Versus
Dattatray Ganapati Gurav - Respondent
Civil Appeal Nos. 9190-9191 of 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos. 21952-53 of 2014)
Decided on : 16-11-2015
1995 (2) Mh.L.J. 336 – Referred
Facts of the case:
One Chandrabai, issueless widow died on 2.12.1984. She was owner of certain properties in the Village. An application was moved under Section 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 before Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kolhapur, by appellant Vishwanath Dadu Gurav who sought probate of Will dated 11.9.1984, said to have been executed by Chandrabai.
The trial court decided all the issues in favour of the applicant and directed issuance of probate in the name of Vishwanath Dadu Gurav in respect of Will dated 11.9.1984, executed by Chandrabai Annappa Gurav.
Original opponent Dattatray Ganapati Gurav filed Regular Civil Appeal which was allowed and the probate granted was set aside.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed on behalf of the original applicant.
Finding of the Court:
Grounds not taken in writ petition cannot be allowed to be raised in review.
Result: Appeals disposed of.
Judgment
Prafulla C. Pant, J.
These appeals are directed against order dated 14.3.2012 whereby the High Court of Judicature at Bombay has dismissed the Writ Petition No. 2576 of 2003, affirming the order dated 17.10.1997, passed by the Third Additional District Judge, Kolhapur, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 124 of 1991. Appellants have further challenged order dated 7.1.2014 passed by the High Court whereby Review Petition Stamp No. 33147 of 2012 (in Writ Petition No. 2576 of 2003) is dismissed.
2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the papers on record.
3. Briefly stated, one Chandrabai, issueless widow, resident of Khochi, Taluka Hatkanangale, District Kolhapur, died on 2.12.1984. She was owner of certain properties in the Village. An application was moved under Section 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 before Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kolhapur, by appellant Vishwanath Dadu Gurav who sought probate of Will dated 11.9.1984, said to have been executed by Chandrabai. In said application, which was registered as Civil Application No. 20 of 1989, the appellant pleaded that Chandrabai, widow of Annappa Gurav was his cousin aunt, and she used to live with him. Chandrabai and her husband, being issueless, were maintained by the appellant till their death. It is also pleaded that a Will dated 11.9.1984 was executed in a sound condition of mind by Chandrabai in the appellant’s favour in respect of properties mentioned in the application in presence of Dr. B.A. Herwade (PW-2), and two witnesses, namely, Mahadev Ramngiri Gosavi (PW-4) and Dinkar Shripati Patil. The deed was written by one Sayed. Out of the two attesting witnesses Dinkar Shripati Patil died on 24.5.1985. On the basis of Will, the appellant got his name entered in the revenue record in respect of property in question, vide mutation entry No. 1637 dated 25.1.1985, but on the objection of respondent the entry was cancelled. Therefore, the petition for probate was filed by the appellant.
4. Respondent Dattatray Ganapati Gurav opposed the probate application, and claimed that it was he who was looking after the deceased till her death. He denied that the deceased executed any Will in favour of the appellant Vishwanath Dadu Gurav. The respondent further pleaded that he is in possession of the property of the deceased.
5. The trial court, on the basis of the pleadings of the parties, framed following issues:
(i) Whether the deceased testator Chandrabai Annappa Gurav was owner of the property in question?
(ii) Whether the Will is valid and duly executed by testator in his favour?
(iii) Whether the applicant entitled to the probate or letter of administration as prayed?
(iv) To what order, if any, the applicant is entitled?
6. The parties filed their documentary evidence in support of their cases, and also led oral evidence. The trial court, after hearing the parties, decided all the issues in favour of the applicant and directed issuance of probate in the name of Vishwanath Dadu Gurav in respect of Will dated 11.9.1984, executed by Chandrabai Annappa Gurav.
7. Aggrieved by said judgment and order dated 15.3.1991, passed on Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 20 of 1989, original opponent Dattatray Ganapati Gurav filed Regular Civil Appeal No. 124 of 1991 before the District Judge, Kolhapur, which was allowed on 17.10.1997, after hearing the parties, and the probate granted was set aside. Thereafter writ petition No. 2576 of 2003 appears to have been filed on behalf of the original applicant on the ground that the appeal was not maintainable before the District Judge/Additional District Judge (Kolhapur). The High Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground that in view of law laid down in Manohar Bapurao Sapre v. Bhaurao Tukaramji Shirbhate and Another, 1995 (2) Mh.L.J. 336 as the valuation of the property was only Rs.25,000/-as such the district court had appellate jurisdiction. Hence this appeal through special leave.
8. However, the original applicant Vishwana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.