SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1085

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, R.BANUMATHI
INDIAN INSTT. OF PLANNING & MGMT. – Appellant
Versus
AK & I ADVERTISING PVT. LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

J.S.KHEHAR, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The respondent-M/s AK & I Advertising Pvt. Ltd. and the appellants were admittedly in a contractual relationship wherein the respondent was assigned with the responsibility of handling advertisement work of the appellants. According to the agreement between the parties, the payment mechanism settled between the parties required the respondent to raise bills with supporting vouchers within 15 to 30 days of the publication of the advertisement. The bills were to be honoured within 55 days of the date of publication and/or telecast of the advertisement. It is also not a matter of dispute, that Clause 11 of the contract contemplated, that disputes and differences arising between the parties in connection with their contractual obligations would be referred to an arbitrator as agreed to by the parties. And that, the dispute would be settled in consonance with the provisions of the Indian Arbitration Act.

3. It is also not a matter of dispute, that consequent upon differences arising between the parties, the contract was eventually terminated by the appellants in December, 2006. After the termination of the contract, the respondent -M/s AK & I A












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top