SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, PRAFULLA C.PANT
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Ram Manohar Pandey – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J.
Leave granted
2. These appeals have been preferred by the appellant-State of Madhya Pradesh against the common order dated 5th November, 2 012 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore. By the common impugned order, the Division Bench allowed the two revision petitions preferred by respondent-Ram Manohar Pandey and quashed the order dated 16lh September, 2011 passed by the Special Judge (under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988), Ujjain in Special Case No. 16 of 2004 with respect to Crime No. 66 of 1993 and Special Case No. 17 of 2004 with respect to Crime No. 67 of 1993.
3. The respondent-who was appointed on the post of a Sub-Engineer w.e.f. 1.7.1972 in the Medical Council, Biaora, District Rajgarh was initially promoted to the higher post of Assistant Engineer and thereafter to the post of Executive Engineer by resolution dated 9th May, 1988. He was placed on deputation with Municipal Corporation, Ujjain from 1991-1993 as City Engineer. While he was working there, certain charges of corruption were made against him. The Dy. S.P, Special Police Establishment Lokayukta, Ujjain filed complaints against t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.