SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 988

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla and Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ.
Indian Council of Medical Research - Appellant
Versus
Shri T.N. Sanikop and other - Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 10172-10175 of 2014 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 25507-25510 of 2007).
Decided on : 12.11.2014.

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Ms. Madhu Sikri and Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal and Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Advocates.

Headnote:

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 41 Rule 22 - Notification – Land Acquisition – Seeking enhancement of rate/quantum of compensation - Division Bench of the High Court partly allowed the first appeals filed by the respondents herein (land owners) and while modifying the award of the Addl. Civil Judge in respondents favour enhanced quantum of compensation payable to the respondents for their lands which were acquired by State under Act, 1894 - Feeling aggrieved by judgment passed by the High Court, appellant (Central Government Organization) for whose benefit lands in question are acquired has filed these appeals by way of special leave - Whether High Court was justified in partly allowing respondents appeals by enhancing the rate/quantum of compensation payable to respondents (land owners) for their acquired lands under the Act - Held, Court decline to examine the legal issue raised by the learned senior counsel for appellant by way of his preliminary objection that cross objections filed by the respondents under Order 41 Rule 22 of Code of Civil Procedure Code are not maintainable and leave this legal question open for its decision in any other appropriate case provided it is not yet decided by this Court - Impugned judgment and decree is modified to extent indicated above - Concerned LAO is directed to calculate compensation payable to respondents (land owners) for their lands at the rate of Rs. 70,000/- per gunta and accordingly calculate all statutory compensation such as solatium, interest etc. payable under Act to every land owner whose land is acquired by the State under the Act - Appeals filed by ICMR succeed and are accordingly allowed in part -

JUDGMENT

Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. - Leave granted.

2. These appeals arise out of judgment dated 23.03.2007 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in MFA Nos. 5723/2005, 5722/2005, 6332/2005 and 6868/2005 which arise out of award dated 31.03.2005 passed by the III Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Belgaum in L.A.C. Nos. 11/1999, 12/1999, 13/1999 and 14/1999.

3. By the impugned judgment/decree, the Division Bench of the High Court partly allowed the first appeals filed by the respondents herein (land owners) and while modifying the award of the Addl. Civil Judge, Belgaum in respondents' favour enhanced the quantum of compensation payable to the respondents for their lands which were acquired by the State under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). Feeling aggrieved by the judgment passed by the High Court, the appellant (Central Government Organization) for whose benefit the lands in question are acquired has filed these appeals by way of special leave.

4. The question that arises for consideration in these appeals is whether the High Court was justified in partly allowing the respondents' appeals by enhancing the rate/quantum of compensation payable to the respondents (land owners) for their acquired lands under the Act?

5. In order to appreciate the controversy involved in these appeals, it is necessary to state the relevant facts infra.

6. The respondents are the owners of the land bearing R.S. Nos. 1323 CTS No. 5435-1B, R.S. No. 1323-1B-2 CTS No. 5435-1B-2, R.S. No. 1323-B1 CTS No. 5435-B and R.S. No. 1323-1B-3 CTS No. 5435-B-3 measuring total 40 guntas situated near Nehru Medical College, Belgaum. In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 4 of the Act, the State Government issued a notification on 19.12.1994 and acquired a large chunk of land measuring 40 guntas for establishment of Indian Medical Research Centre. This acquisition of land was for the benefit of Indian Council of Medical Research (in short "the ICMR") - an Institute wholly owned and controlled by the Central Government, who were desirous of setting up one Medical Center in Belgaum town, for the benefit of public at large. It was followed by the declaration published on 30.11.1995 under Section 6 of the Act. The respondents' lands in question were acquired pursuant to the aforementioned Notification under Section 4 of the Act. This led to initiation of proceedings for determination of compensation payable to each land owner including that of the respondents herein by the Land Acquisition Officer (in short called "the LAO"). Notices were accordingly issued to the respondents as per Section 9 of the Act calling upon them to participate in the land acquisition proceedings to enable the LAO to determine the fair market value of the land on the date of acquisition as provided under Section 23 of the Act so that the compensation is paid to the land owners at such determined rate. The LAO held an enquiry and after affording an opportunity to the respondents passed an award on 06.03.1998.

7. The LAO fixed the compensation at the rate of Rs. 1050/- per gunta = Rs. 42,000/- per acre, payable to the respondents for their lands in question as in his opinion, the respondents were entitled to claim compensation for their lands at the rate of, Rs. 1050/- per gunta being the fair market value of the acquired lands in question.

8. Feeling aggrieved by the said award, the respondents sought reference to the Civil Court for re-determination of the compensation made by the LAO. The reference Court, on the basis of the evidence, partly answered the respondents' reference in their favour and by judgment dated 31.03.2005 enhanced the rate of compensation from Rs. 1050/- per gunta to Rs. 7,000/- = Rs. 2,80,000/- per acre. In other words, the reference Court held that the respondents were entitled to get compensation for their lands at the rate of Rs. 7000/- per gunta = Rs. 2,80,000/- per acre being the fair market value of their lands from the


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top