T.S.THAKUR, C.NAGAPPAN
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal arise out of an order dated 28.01.2014 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore whereby Criminal Revision No. 98 of 2014 filed by the appellant against an order dated 24.12.2013 passed by the Special Judge, NDPS, Indore has been dismissed.
3. The appellant is being prosecuted before the Special Judge, NDPS, Indore for offences punishable under Sections 8, 21, 22, 29 read with 8(C) of the NDPS Act, 1985. The prosecution case it appears is that the appellant was nabbed in front of Yashica Palace hotel near Gangwal bus stand at Indore between 1800 and 1900 hrs. on 24.02.2013 by the Intelligence Officer of the Narcotics Control Bureau carrying 610 gms of heroin and 40 gms. of Alprazolum in a bag which was seized by the Officer effecting the arrest. A mobile phone Sim No. 90395020407 was also according to the prosecution, seized from the possession of the appellant. While the trial has yet to commence on the charge sheet filed against the appellant, an application was filed on his behalf before the Special Judge, NDPS, Indore praying for a direction summoning call details that would indicate the locations of three different mobile teleph
[No cases identified as bad law. None of the excerpts contain keywords or phrases indicating that any cited case has been overruled, reversed, abrogated, criticized, questioned, or otherwise treated as bad law.]
[All cases positively treated (relied upon, cited in support, or followed)]:
*Upashu VS State Of Punjab - 2021 0 Supreme(P&H) 654*: Gupta relies upon the judgment, specifically pointing to paragraph 7 – indicates reliance and positive treatment as authoritative.
*State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi VS Nizamuddin @ Nizam - 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 1921*: Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under – presented as binding precedent from Supreme Court.
*Balwinder Singh @ Gora VS State of Punjab - 2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 2148*: Learned counsel relied upon the case to support his case – indicates positive reliance.
*Sonu @ Sanjay VS State of Haryana - 2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 598*: Cited alongside other judgments to support the case – treated as supportive authority.
*Paramjit Kaur VS State of Haryana - 2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 1323*: A two Judge Bench considered the necessity... has considered – explicitly references the Supreme Court bench's ruling as relevant and authoritative on preserving call detail records.
*Satnam @ Sattu VS State of Haryana - 2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 90*: Reference can also be made to the judgment – cited positively alongside other Supreme Court cases.
*Chhinder Pal Singh VS State of Haryana - 2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 575*: Referred to in support of contentions – counsel uses it affirmatively.
*Gurcharan Singh VS State of Punjab - 2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 1179*: Placed reliance upon the judgment – clear positive reliance by counsel on Supreme Court ruling.
*ANANTHU K.S vs STATE OF KERALA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24262*: The case supports the admissibility... considering the identical facts and circumstances... as in Suresh – explicitly states the case supports a legal proposition and is applied due to similar facts.
[None. All cases show clear patterns of positive treatment through reliance, reference, or supportive citation. No ambiguous language detected.]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.