SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1173

DIPAK MISRA, PRAFULLA C.PANT
Manorama Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Nath Rai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants: Ratnakar Dash, Piyush Kumar, Samir Ali Khan

JUDGMENT :

Prafulla C. Pant, J.

Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against order dated 16.4.2012, passed by the High Court of Judicature Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, in Criminal Revision No. 220 of 2002 whereby said Court has disposed of the criminal revision, affirming order of the Magistrate by which application under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) moved by appellants was rejected.

3. Brief facts of the case are that Miss Tapsi Rai, aged 14 years, daughter of respondent Surendra Nath Rai, underwent surgery on 5.8.1997 in Maharani Government Hospital, Jagdalpur, Bastar. The operation necessitated due to pain developed by the patient in the abdomen, was performed by the appellants, namely, Dr. (Smt.) Manorama Tiwari, Dr. B.R. Kawdo and Dr. Pradeep Pandey. Before conducting the surgery, consent to operate was taken from the respondent. However, even after surgery, the condition of the patient did not improve, and she died on the same day.

4. A First Information Report was lodged by the respondent after lapse of more than five months, i.e. on 2.2.1998 relating to offence punishable under Section 304A of Indian Penal Code at Police Station, Jagdalpur agai























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top