SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 1155

A.K.PATNAIK, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Madivallappa V. Marabad – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. This is an appeal by way of special leave granted by this Court under Article 136 of the Constitution against the judgment and order dated 18th July, 2005 of the Karnataka High Court passed in Criminal Appeal No. 515 of 1999. The facts very briefly are that within one and half years of the marriage of Parvetavva with the Appellant No. 1, Parvetavva consumed poison and died on 3rd December, 1991. An F.I.R. was lodged by the brother of the deceased Parvetavva and pursuant to the F.I.R. a case was registered by the police and after investigation, charge-sheet was filed against the Appellants under Sections 498A and 304B read with Section 34, Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The Appellants, namely, the husband of the deceased, his mother and sister were tried and at the trial before the Principal Sessions Judge, Belgaum, the elder brother of the deceased was examined as PW-1, the mother of the deceased was examined as PW-4, a friend of brother of the deceased was examined as PW-6 and a witness to an alleged marriage agreement (Ext. P 1) was examined as PW-11.

2. The prosecution case before the Trial Court was that under the alleged marria










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top