SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 1170

S.S.NIJJAR, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
S. N. Dhingra – Appellant
Versus
State, NCT of Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. This Appeal is directed against the Judgment of the Learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court in Criminal Revision No. 521 of 2003 decided on 24-7-2003. The appellant prays that certain objectionable and derogatory remarks made against him by the learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court in the impugned Judgment be expunged. The remarks which are sought to be expunged are as follows:-

1. It appears that Shri S.N. Dhingra, Addl. Sessions Judge has scant regard for the judgments of this court and sticks to the procedure of trial of complaint cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act invented by him and not the one prescribed under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The illegality, harshness and judicial tyranny is writ large in the impugned order as the learned ASJ imposed a cost of Rs. 15,000.

5. .....................At the first instance procedure adopted by the learned ASJ suffers from every vice that illegality, irregularity, infirmity and non adherence of mandatory provisions laid down in the Criminal Procedure Code.

6. Even on the premise of




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top