SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 1193

R.M.LODHA, MADAN B.LOKUR
Ehsan Khalid – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. Permission to argue in-person is granted. In this Writ Petition (Public Interest Litigation), the issue with regard to divestment of 10% equity of Coal India Limited (CIL) in October 2010 has been raised. It is alleged that powerful financial institutes usurped the natural resources only on payment of Rs. 15,200 Crores and caused loss to the exchequer of Rs. 1.75 Lakh Crores to the nation. According to the Petitioner, the proposal of equity disinvestment was neither legal nor transparent. The existing norms and government laid down policies were flouted.

2. On July 15, 2013, this Court directed the Petitioner, who appears in-person, to serve a copy of the Writ Petition along with all annexures to Mr. D.S. Mahra, advocate-on-record, to enable Mr. Siddharth Luthra, learned Additional Solicitor General, to take instructions in the matter.

3. We have heard Mr. Ehsan Khalid, Petitioner-in-person and Mr. Siddharth Luthra, learned Additional Solicitor General.

4. Mr. Siddharth Luthra placed before us Office Memorandum dated 03.08.2013 alongwith annexures. He stated that entire process of Initial Public Officer (EPO) of CIL was carried out in a transparent manner and as per the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top