SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 943

R.M.LODHA, ANIL R.DAVE
Paramount Enterprises Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
S. D. Surie (D) Thr. L. Rs. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. Leave granted. The present Appellants are the Defendant Nos. 1 to 8 in the suit filed by Lt. Col. S.D. Surie (since deceased), now represented by his legal representatives who are Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in the appeal and shall be referred to collectively as 'plaintiff hereinafter.

2. The original Plaintiff filed a suit for declaration claiming that the alienation and sale certificate of property No. 6, Amrita Shergil Marg, New Delhi was void, illegal and ineffective qua his 1/3rd share in the property.

3. An application (I.A. No. 516 of 1994) was made by the original Plaintiff seeking amendment in the plaint in 1994 whereby alternative prayer for partition was sought to be added. The application was granted on May 26, 2006. As per the order passed by the Court on May 26, 2006, the amended plaint was to be filed within two weeks therefrom and the Defendant Nos. 1 to 8 were permitted to file their amended written statement within four weeks of the filing of the amended plaint. The fact of the matter is that within two weeks from May 26, 2006, the amended plaint was not filed and it was filed on February 7, 2007. The explanation for delay in filing the amended plaint is tha











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top