SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 1048

DIPAK MISRA, UDAY UMESH LALIT
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Kumar Pathak – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. Hearing resumed. In course of hearing, we have thought it appropriate to pass an interim order by which the vacancies can be filled up and the academic climate in the State of Uttar Pradesh shall not suffer an unnecessary winter.

2. Be it noted, this Court on 25th March, 2014, had passed the following order:

"Leave granted.

Hearing expedited.

By this interim order, we direct the State of Uttar Pradesh to fill up the vacancies of Assistant Teachers in the schools pursuant to the advertisement issued on 30.11.2011 as per the directions issued by the Division Bench of Allahabad High Court in the case of Shiv Kumar Pathak and Ors. Special Appeal (Defective) No. 237 of 2013 and connected matters as expeditiously as possible at any rate within 12 weeks' time from today.

Further, the State in the letter of appointment that will be issued to the successful candidates shall mention that their appointment is subject to the result of the civil appeals that are pending before this Court.

The appointee(s) shall not claim any equities at the time of final disposal of the civil appeals. All actions/proceedings of the State Government will be subject to the final result of these civil appea













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top