SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 955

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan and C.K. Prasad, JJ.
Deepak Kumar etc. – Appellant
Vs.
State of Haryana and Ors. etc. – Respondent
I.A. Nos. 12-13, 14-15, 16-17 and 18-19 in SLP (C) Nos. 19628-19629/2009
Decided On : 16.01.2012

Headnote:

Deal with the details furnished in the report – Later it was cancelled and the lease - CEC in its report has specifically referred – CEC in pursuance of our order submitted a detailed report with enclosures – Court have gone through report in extensor and heard learned senior counsel, who is appearing as amicus curiae appearing for State of U.P. and Additional Advocate General appearing for State of Rajasthan First court will deal with details furnished in report pertaining to District Saharanpur, U.P. CEC referred to five mining leases for sand, and boulders presently operating in District Saharanpur. Report says that in Lot area given for mining leases is less than 5 hectares and hence permission was granted by State of U.P. for mining operations without obtaining any environmental clearance – Held, In block eighteen mining leases have been granted and was given environment clearance subject to certain conditions but none of those conditions have been complied with – Court find that there is total inaction on part of officials in permitting those mining leases to operate and officials have completely failed to control illegal mining going on in those areas - CEC in its report has specifically referred mining leases of major minerals lease of minor minerals quarry licenses of minor minerals each having an area less than hectares prevailing in State of Rajasthan - Majority of mining leases have been granted in clusters - It was pointed out that production of more than 60 million MT of bare is taking place without obtaining environment clearance - Further it was pointed out that instead of granting individual leases/mineral concessions State of Rajasthan grants Royalty Collection Contract/excess Royalty Collection contract for bare excavated and removed from specified areas - State of Rajasthan is directed to explain legality and propriety of granting such Royalty Collection Contracts Details of illegal mining going on in Villages of the District of has also been elaborately dealt with by the CEC. CEC visited the three mining areas namely and pointed out how illegal mining is going on in those areas as well - CEC has pointed out four mining leases have been granted in block and Report indicates that environment clearance was granted to those mining leases subject to certain conditions – But none of those conditions is seen complied with. Same is situation with regard to other five mining leases in block eighteen mining leases have been granted and was given environment clearance subject to certain conditions, but none of those conditions have been complied with – Order accordingly

JUDGMENT :

1. This Court on 25.11.2011 passed an order directing the Central Empowered Committee (CEC) to submit a report after carrying out site inspections, under intimation to the MoEF, concerned State Governments and the applicant, regarding the alleged illegal mining going on in some parts of States of U.P. and Rajasthan and also to submit a report regarding the areas identified for mining in the State of Haryana.

2. CEC, in pursuance of our order, submitted a detailed report on 4.1.2012 with enclosures. We have gone through the report in extenso and heard Mr. P.S. Narsimha, learned senior counsel, who is appearing as amicus curiae, Shri Kamlendra Mishra, appearing for the State of U.P. and Shri Manish Singhvi, Additional Advocate General appearing for the State of Rajasthan.

3. CEC conducted site inspections in the notified areas of the District of Saharanpur, U.P., District Alwar, Rajasthan and the areas identified for mining in Districts Yamuna Nagar, Panchkula and Ambala in the State of Haryana.

Uttar Pradesh:

4. First, we will deal with the details furnished in the report pertaining to District Saharanpur, U.P. CEC referred to five mining leases for sand, bajri and boulders presently operating in the District Saharanpur. Report says that in Lot Nos. 7, 16, 22 and 23, the area given for mining leases is less than 5 hectares and hence permission was granted by the State of U.P. for mining operations without obtaining any environmental clearance. With regard to Lot Nos. 7, 8, 13, 26, 27, 28 & 29 relating to mining lease of an area of 686.693 acres, it was stated that the lease was, though originally sanctioned for a period of three years w.e.f. 6.1.2003, later it was cancelled and the lease operated only up to 9.2.2004. However, by virtue of the order passed by the Allahabad High Court in CMWP No. 29797/2009, the lease was allowed to operate for the balance period of one year, ten months and twenty seven days w.e.f. 27.2.2010 and up to 24.1.2012 but without environment clearance on the ground that the lease was originally granted prior to 14.9.2006 the date of the notification of MOEF. Prima facie, we are of the view that the stand taken by the State of U.P. is in clear violation of the provisions of EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006 and the notification is seen mis-interpreted and misapplied, especially when the report says that there has been an increase in annual production, compared to earlier years.

5. Report says that in addition to the above mentioned mining leases, there are about 30 sanctioned mining leases for the collection of sand, bajri and boulders from river Yamuna bed/canal beds in District of Saharanpur. But they are found to be operational without obtaining environment clearance. Report also says that the Environmental Appraisal Committee (EAC) had recommended grant of environment clearance in favour of the above 30 mining leases but the environment clearance was granted by the MoEF only in respect of two of such leases, Lot No. 25 in Village Abdullapur and Lot No. 9 in village Thapal Ismailpur, on specific condition that the prior clearance from the Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) be obtained, since the area fell within the sanctuary. No such permission has been obtained so far. The stand of the State of U.P. before the CEC was that the above 30 mining leases stood closed w.e.f. 30.6.2011. CEC, however, noticed, in reality, they are functioning and large scale illegal mining is going on in the River Yamuna bed and in nearby areas. Further, it was also pointed out that large numbers of screening plants and stone crushers are seen fully operational on both sides of the River bed of Yamuna. Ramps/Roads are seen constructed for to and fro movement of the vehicles from/to such screening plants/crushers. CEC has also produced the Quarterly Returns, transit passes issued by the officers and the quantity of mines and minerals transported. Report says that a total of 60,176 transit permit

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top