SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 78

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS)
JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, DIPAK MISRA, MADAN B. LOKUR, PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, N.V. RAMANA, JJ.
NABAM REBIA – Petitioners
VERSUS
REGISTRAR GENERAL, GAUHATI HIGH COURT AND ORS. – Respondents
WRIT PETITION(C) NO. 53 OF 2016 Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 876/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/01/2016 in WP(C) No. 10/2016 passed by the High Court Of Gauhati) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 779-780/2016
Decided On : 27-01-2016

The court's decision emphasized the importance of providing opportunity for all parties to respond and present their case, ensuring fairness and due process.

Headnote:

Writ Petition - Notice to Respondents - Liberty granted for filing counter affidavits and amending the petition

Fact of the Case:

The court issued notice to respondent nos. 1 and 2, with service on respondent no.3 dispensed till further orders. Liberty was granted to file counter affidavits and to amend the petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court granted liberty to the respondents to file counter affidavits and to the petitioner to amend the petition, while also fixing the next hearing date.

Issues: Service of notice, filing of counter affidavits, amendment of petition, and fixing of next hearing date.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the need to ensure proper service of notice, grant opportunity for filing counter affidavits, and allow the petitioner to amend the petition.

Final Decision: The court ordered notice to respondent nos. 1 and 2, dispensed with service to respondent no.3, granted liberty for filing counter affidavits, and allowed the petitioner to amend the petition, fixing the next hearing date.

ORDER

Writ Petition(C) No. 53 of 2016

Issue notice to respondent nos. 1 and 2 only.

2. Service on respondent no.3 is dispensed with till further orders.

3. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the Union of India, and Mr. Vikas Singh Jangra, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the Governor of Arunachal Pradesh.

4. Learned Attorney General for India appearing for the Union of India seeks liberty till 29.01.2016 to file counter affidavit, if any, and requests that the matter may be posted for hearing on 1.2.2016. Mr. Satya Pal Jain, learned senior counsel representing the Governor of Arunachal Pradesh undertakes to furnish a copy of the Governor's report and other material recommending issuance of a proclamation under Article 356 of the Constitution of India, to the Court in a sealed cover.

In the above view of the matter, liberty is granted to respondent nos. 1 and 2 to file their respective counter affidavits, if any, by 29.01.2016. Respondent no.2 shall also intimate the date of report of the Governor recommending President's Rule to the learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of the day.

On a request made by Mr. Fali S. Nariman, learned senior counsel representing the petitioner, liberty is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to amend Writ Petition No. 53 of 2016, so as to assail the report of the Governor, and the consequential proclamation.

List along with other matters on 1.2.2016 at 2.00 p.m.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top