SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 98

ANIL R.DAVE, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Vanka Neeraja – Appellant
Versus
Veerina Sai @ Sairam – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Anil R. Dave, J.

1. Application for permission to argue and appear as respondent in-person is allowed.

2. Leave granted.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent, party in-person.

4. Looking at the facts of the case, we are of the view that the High Court should have transferred the matrimonial case O.P.No.61 of 2014 titled as Veerina Sai @ Sai Ram Vs. Veerina Neeraja from the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Narasapuram, West Godavari District to the Family Court, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad. We, therefore, direct that the case shall be transferred accordingly.

5. With the above directions, the appeal is disposed of as allowed with no order as to costs.

6. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top